- Joined
- Oct 25, 2007
- Messages
- 524
Mr.Claycomb/Sal,
I think it looks like a great design, can't wait to taking it hiking/camping.
I think it looks like a great design, can't wait to taking it hiking/camping.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Philthygeezer,
While the blade may be stronger due to coming with a Scandi single bevel grind, this is incidental and wasnt something that figured in the thought process behind the design. When we were talking to Sal about edge geometry we suggested 20-25 degrees total, the prototypes were ground at a greater angle and although I cant find the exact figure, I am pretty sure it was 30 degrees total. This isnt a weak edge for wood working, but some care will be needed if you want to bang it against bone when dressing big game or doing heavy splitting. Being able to carve really well was one of the leading pieces of design intent. There are lots of sturdy knives out there, but not so many that cut (wood) really well. The guard design looks about perfect. Puukos don't have guards, but I like a little one to index my hand. Any bigger just gets in the way.
On the rock sharpening thing. I have yet to actually meet someone who uses knives of the style that I make who has this as a criteria when choosing a knife. I have read it a few times on US forums, maybe its a cultural thing, or maybe geographicAnyway, I had dismissed it as something I should be worrying about well before designing this knife, and while working on this project it never re-entered my mind.
Let me explain why. There are several reasons.
The first is possibly due to a complete lack of imagination on my part. In spite of trying, I cannot conceive of a situation where I would plan on sharpening my knife on a rock; if I expect that I will need to sharpen my knife, I would plan on taking a pocket hone to do so. This would go in whatever clothing or pack would be going with me. If I didnt have space for a pocket hone, some wet-n-dry paper would do almost as well. Good, fine grained, stones arent all that common in the areas that I have spent time. I dont generally want anything harder to sharpen than D2 or S30V, but given the choice between something that would keep its edge even longer, and something softer that would respond well to a rock, I would have to go for the super-steel because suitable stones seem so rare. Good stones may be available to some people, but I dont think that chancing on finding one should be part of most folks plan. If that is the case, then it shouldnt be a major consideration during a production knifes design process either.
Next, the only thing that really strikes me as an activity that will dull a knife such that it needs repeated in-field sharpening, that could be achieved on a 220grit river stonewould be skinning big game. While this is a bushcraft knife, bushcraft has many meanings for different people, field dressing and skinning ability were not at the top of the list of design requirements for this knife. If they had been, the handle would have been flatter, much narrower at the front, there might well have been more guard, and it would have had a flat or hollow grind. This knife was intended to be good at woodwork, first and foremost. Whenever I have been on extended trips and have been doing a lot of carving, battoning, splitting and cleaning small game, I have wanted to sharpen occasionally, but only because I have wanted to restore a shaving edge. Using a local stone would have been worse than just carrying on with stropping against a dirty leather belt.
Scandi single bevels sharpen easy on nice flat hones. Their purpose is to give extra control on cuts where the width of the bevel acts like the sole of a plane. I do know that some people like to use convex scandis and others like to add a micro bevel, but for them to work best on wood, the bevel must be dead flat, or slightly concave. Unless you were able to find or produce a flat surface from your local stone, you would quickly render your flat bevel into a convex shape which would take quite a lot of effort to remove at a later date. If you really feel that a bush knife needs to be something that can be sharpened on a rock, I would think that a flat grind with a secondary bevel would be a better buy. That smaller bevel would be a lot easier to work and there would be fewer problems with inadvertently changing the edge geometry. Having to take 5/16 of steel off has to be harder than just working on just 3/32 or so.
Finally, if everything really has gone to hell in a hand cart and someone just must re-sharpen on a rock, and they are lucky enough to find a good one, its not likely to be situation where they are going to worry much what it does to the knife. I would hope though that such occurrences are rare enough that anticipating them does not become the primary driver when buying kit. If it does, there are already a whole lot of other knives on the market that are designed for chopping, prying, pounding on . and sharpening on rocks![]()
I know that some people will disagree strongly with the above, but any designers out there will recognise that it is nigh on impossible to please everyone. Pretty much every feature of this knife was chosen knowing that whatever was done, somewhere, someone, was going to be annoyed :grumpy: that we hadnt done it some other way!![]()
no, we haven't. but really want! i've seen some pictures of your knives on www.synobyte.com and www.britishblades.com and i must say - cool knives! especially this:
![]()
i'm looking forward to seeing photos of prototypes as soon as possible!
LOL Sorry New guy here.![]()
Wow...I really like this knife. Who makes them and were can I buy one?
LOL Sorry New guy here.![]()
Welcome to Bladeforums! The post you responded to is from June 27, 2008.
The last post before yours: December 2, 2008.