Apparently, enough people "dislike" it that Crucible felt the need to bring out S35VN
It was because of all the "chipping" complaints here and other forums. From what I've read Crucible never really found anything wrong with the knives that were sent to them for testing. One was heat treated incorrectly, one was burned like on a grinder ( figure that one out.

) Etc. They brought out S35VN to get the folks who think it's a chipping prone steel an option of a knife with almost the same wear resistance. It also helps out the professional knife makers who complained about it being difficult to finish and eating belts. When you do it for a living any extra time saved, and longer life of belts means money savings.
S35VN got off to a rough start here through no fault of the steel. One guy who did most of the discovering of the "problem" , did lots of posting on you tube, and several forums including this has refused to send the knife in to W&R for lab testing. He has claimed there is no need because it doesn't have problems anymore or something similar. He has since made statements in other threads claiming that he sharpens every knife that he gets before use. This leaves open the possibility of his troubles being related to his own sharpening. We'll never know as the knife hasn't hit the lab yet.
The steel seems to be doing exactly what it was designed to do, rolling and not chipping. It does admittedly have a bit less abrasive wear than S30V but how much so you really are not going to tell unless you do some real testing.
Back on the subject of S30V, I found that I like the Carpenter analog CTS BD30P (?) which came out in a Spyderco sprint. Slightly cleaner, crisper sharpening and possible slight wear advantage. It's a nice user steel anyway, which I also consider S30V as.
S30V is a great example of how far we have come in my lifetime anyway on steels overall, and Stainless cutlery steels especially. I recall when knives were marked "stainless" or "surgical" and did not perform worth squat. One reason for my fondness of carbon and alloy tool steels. It wasn't until 92 when I bought my first Gin 1 ( marked G-2) Endura, and actually had respect for it. It took a decent edge, better than 440C IMO, but had a bit less wear resistance. It was sure better than most of the "surgical steel" knives made before then. This steel was supposed to be a stainless version ( sort of) of 3V. That's supposedly why it was called S30V instead of S40V ( 4% vanadium, not 3%.
That we could be bored with, or not impressed with the performance of S30V shows just how far we've come in that time. It's pretty amazing if you think of it
Joe