Nathan the Machinist
KnifeMaker / Machinist / Evil Genius
Moderator
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Messages
- 19,152
Interesting looking blade Nathan...I'm curious...Were you surfacing that blade? The code in the pic seems to support this.
Bill
Yes, I was, by surface isolines.
To answer your question, Bruce Boone, the blade isn't tiled, and there's no taper to the end mill. That approach would work on a straight edge, but it wouldn't work right around the belly. I created the blade shape and grind and edge thickness I wanted in CAD first. It is a 10" hollow "grind", so it has a 5" radius which remains perpendicular to the edge as it goes around the belly. I created the blade shape with a single continuous NURBS type spline, so there are no C1 surface discontinuities (I'll give a better explanation what this means if anyone wants to know) and specified the tool path to follow the surface iso lines so the cuts are made as a smooth motion from end to end. You can kind of get the idea on the second pict. That machining strategy results in the smoothest most natural finish, which means no blending and less bench time sanding. It also requires three axis simultaneous motion along a spline shape, which most any CNC today can handle beautifully. But it is a good example of something that couldn't be programmed manually, so requires CAM.
I could have changed the design to make it something that could be programmed manually, but for me that would be the tail wagging the dog. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with that approach. But this is what it takes for me to get what I want, so this is what I mean when I said it takes CAM to fully utilize CNC. I guess I should have said it takes CAM for me to fully utilize CNC.