My 2012 CQC7AW, plain edge, satin finish(just picked it up today

) listed at 3.8oz by Emerson, came in at 5.0oz, or 144g on my scale.
My 2007 CQC11, plain edge, black blade, came in at 5.9oz, or 169 grams on my scale. Emersons website lists the CQC11 at 5.1oz, though the picture is of a stone wash blade, so not really an accurate comparison, and there could be other variances from over the years.
I'm going to guess Emerson just uses the same weight for each basic model, rather than putting up the weight for each variant. At least given that Ernie1980's cqc7 comes in at the listed weight.
Weights dont bother me as long as its a decent size. The cqc7 carries nicely in my jeans pocket, while I find the -11 is too big, at least for daily carry. The hefty feeling is nice in hand, very confidence inspiring.
As much as nutnfancys a tool, his shot show interview with Mr. Emerson was a great watch, and Ernest said it himself, "if you've ever had to hump a ruck, you know a couple ounces makes a difference...". (not a direct quote). While I don't share the OP's annoyance with the weight, I do feel he has a valid point.