- Joined
- Jan 28, 2007
- Messages
- 1,236
You know what I carry for starting fires? Two things: a bic lighter, and a firesteel. I use the firesteel once in a while, if there is a bit of fatwood around, or if I happen to have some on me.
But I don't pack any charcloth or other tinder. In fact, I don't see the point of this at all. Here is why:
To make charcloth work, it has to be dry. At least that's my experience. But you know what else works really well as long as you keep it dry? A bic lighter, and you can probably light a hundred times as many fires with a bic lighter as you can with an equivalent volume (or even weight) of charcloth.
Another good solution is the whole vaseline/cotton ball thing...except again, if you have a bic lighter, for the weight or space, you will get a lot more uses out of the bic. And once the balls are gone, they're gone...just like the butane. But at least you get a little sparker with the bic.
Now I am all for primitive technology...I drive an '86 ford. But if I am out in the bush, I generally want maximum utility for my space/weight. How many firestraws do you figure you need to compete with one disposable lighter?
And with char cloth and fire straws, and all the other artificial tinder, you can't just go making more indefinitely. I guess in a survival situation you could make more charcloth by giving up on a pair of pants etc, and then the skills you developed using it in the past would be worthwhile, but man, how much better off would you have been if you owned a 99 cent lighter as well? No cutting up your pants to burn, etc...
Anyway I often question the logic of packing things like fire pistons etc, just because the tinder seems just as artificial and manufactured as my bics, if you know what I mean, only with a lot more drawbacks.
The toys are cool...is our love of old school gear causing us to overlook better solutions to survival problems?
But I don't pack any charcloth or other tinder. In fact, I don't see the point of this at all. Here is why:
To make charcloth work, it has to be dry. At least that's my experience. But you know what else works really well as long as you keep it dry? A bic lighter, and you can probably light a hundred times as many fires with a bic lighter as you can with an equivalent volume (or even weight) of charcloth.
Another good solution is the whole vaseline/cotton ball thing...except again, if you have a bic lighter, for the weight or space, you will get a lot more uses out of the bic. And once the balls are gone, they're gone...just like the butane. But at least you get a little sparker with the bic.
Now I am all for primitive technology...I drive an '86 ford. But if I am out in the bush, I generally want maximum utility for my space/weight. How many firestraws do you figure you need to compete with one disposable lighter?
And with char cloth and fire straws, and all the other artificial tinder, you can't just go making more indefinitely. I guess in a survival situation you could make more charcloth by giving up on a pair of pants etc, and then the skills you developed using it in the past would be worthwhile, but man, how much better off would you have been if you owned a 99 cent lighter as well? No cutting up your pants to burn, etc...
Anyway I often question the logic of packing things like fire pistons etc, just because the tinder seems just as artificial and manufactured as my bics, if you know what I mean, only with a lot more drawbacks.
The toys are cool...is our love of old school gear causing us to overlook better solutions to survival problems?