- Joined
- Feb 18, 2009
- Messages
- 4,573
I haven't heard the opposite case of the OP. Sometimes there are fan boys and sometimes there are slam boys. Slam boys seem to go out of their way to run down a company and post their hatred towards them no matter what a given knife is being compared to. I guess the mentions of Cold Steel fit in this case. Personally, I tend to be a bit choosy on who I patronage with my purchases but I don't go out of my way to slam the ones that I decide for one reason or another. The exception might be a little joke here and there at Lynn's expense. Lets face it, he deserves it but I don't often knock Cold Steel knives unless the model in question poses a trait I do not like.
I tend to endorse RatCutlery often. I own several of their knives but I find I rarely offer them up to the exclusion of the other manufacturers I also like. I do get defensive when people slam my favorite product based on non-sense logic. For example, a common argument for the inferiority of TOPs or RC blades is the fact that they are 1095 and then the person says something to the effect that everyone knows 1095 is a cheap steel an thus providing the insinuation that the above products are somehow overpriced. Those kinds of things piss me off because they are just plain wrong.
Good post, Ken. I particularly like the term "slam boys" since it perfectly describes a type of poster we've all seen. There used to be one who, any time mention was made of either Ka-Bar or Becker was made in a thread, they had to jump in and slam them. It was becoming a bit tedious.
I also dislike those who slam an entire company based their perception of one knife. That's illogical, yet I've seen it happen more than once. Every company makes a mistake at one time or another; the QC can slip on one knife; they get the heat treat wrong for some reason; the batch of steel they get from a supplier may have undetected inclusions there are things that slip by from time to time. To condemn the entire output and the entire company because of one faulty knife is ridiculous.
Awhile back I was sent a knife for review, which I did (http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=7085290#post7085290). I thought that there were some, to me, less than desirable design features on this knife, but the steel was decent and the quality was okay at its price point. It was a Chinese import by a very reputable company: I certainly wouldn't bad mouth that company for what I perceived as design flaws. I actually gave it a pretty fair review (although I didn't rush out to buy one). I've seen people who would have slammed the knife and the company itself, and that's just wrong.
As far as your comments on 1095: right on. I'm a big fan of simple, strong knives, and 1095 as done by either Becker or RAT rates really high with me. Cheap steel? Not in my book: good, dependable steel at a good price, yes.