ATS34=fragile 440V=soft M2=hype: Steel Gossip

Lomic:

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Although the STEEL may only have a RC or 55-56, those tough little Vanadium Carbides have a Rockwell of 80-85!

It is actually the Vanadium Carbides that do the cutting and hold the edge, while the rest of the steel just gives it strength and holds things together.</font>

If the edge is badly deformed the cutting ability will be very low even if the V-carbides are freshly faced. At a low hardness the strength of the metal will be relatively low and thus the edge will roll and/or dent readily. Thus the push cutting ability will be very low because of the vastly increased cut resistance and as well the slicing ability will be shot as the carbides will not all cut on the same tract and very few will be perpendicular to the direction of the slice.

Rdrangerer, the grain structure can be blown in a steel in a number of ways. If you don't preheat the piece correctly, soak the steel too long, wait too long to temper it after hardning, etc., basically if you don't do everything the way you should.

As R.J. noted, the most complex high speed steels are much more difficult to heat treat because they are much more sensitive and even a small mistake like soaking for a couple of minutes too long can blow the grain size.

As for how grain size effects performance, this is something I would like clarifed as well. There are some things that I think I have a handle on but somethings that are a bit more muddled often because many references use the same term to mean very different things. So here goes :

A finer grain structure will result in a stronger metal. This is because as the grain size decreases the total surface area increases and the surface boundries of the grains are what impede internal movement and thus allow the metal to resist outside forces.

(Note there are lots of other factors which effect strength besides grain surface area.)

By pretty much the same effect, the impact toughness decreases as you decrease the grain structure because the metal no longer has the ability to absorb dynamic loads by internal movement. However the static toughness might actually increase as it depends directly on the strength and ductility. And while the ductility decreases the strength will increase.

So for example if you heat treat to say 52 RC as opposed to 58 RC you get a stronger steel. I think this is due in part to the smaller grain size at 58 RC. This would also fit with the fact that at softer RC's steels start to get very aggressive slicing due to the larger grain size.


However, this is where it gets a bit cloudy. For example if you do something wrong and it causes the grain size to increase you might not get a tougher steel nor an aggressive slicer because the carbide dispersion might be poor and if you have huge clumps of carbides you could get fractures easily as compared to small carbides dispersed throughout the steel and poor edge holding as the large carbides could readily break out from the edge.

Anyway, it would seem to me that as you decrease the grain size you get an edge that will remain crisp for longer periods of time and will push cut better as it will have greater wear resistance and strength. But for steels with larger grain sizes (D2) you get an edge which is more aggressive slicing. I don't think that sharpening will be readily effected except to the extent that which structure will take less damage and/or lose less metal from the edge.

R.J. (or anyone else), if I went off somewhere in the above, by all means correct it.

-Cliff
 
NO OFFENSE TO ANYONE HERE. Ya really cannot talk about steels being good or bad unless:

You are a knife maker
You are a Metalurgist
 
Sure you can. We do it all the time. Of course we are armchair knife makers and amature metalurgists, so maybe we qualify anyway.
wink.gif
 
Ha....ha.
Wouldn't be much of a forum if only knife makers and metallurgists were allowed to talk about knives.
It's not about good and bad, anyway, but which is suited to what purpose.
 
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by King Grinch:
NO OFFENSE TO ANYONE HERE. Ya really cannot talk about steels being good or bad unless:

You are a knife maker
You are a Metalurgist
</font>

By extension, if I'm watching a football game, am I not allowed to comment on the action if I'm not a professional player or coach myself?

A lot of bladeforums folks have done research -- both book-learnin' and real live bench testing -- and know a good deal about steels. I have seen plenty of times when one of the amateurs was right, and a knifemaker was wrong. I've also seen metallurgists, who don't always understand the exact demands of various forms of cutlery, miss because of that. No doubt, both groups are authoratative and should be listened to (in fact, you see both Robert and Cliff asking RJ rather than lecturing him, right?), but the view that we amateurs shouldn't comment is a bit loopy, if ya ask me.

 
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by King Grinch:
NO OFFENSE TO ANYONE HERE. Ya really cannot talk about steels being good or bad unless:

You are a knife maker
You are a Metalurgist
</font>

rolleyes.gif


So, only let the makers and edgeucated people have an opinion? I call that a BAD thing. I may not have those qualifications, but I understand a fair bit about carbides and other elements in steel production. More than some and less than others. Is M2 a good steel? Hell yes! Works a LOT better than ATS-34 or 154CM for ME. Is it overkill on a mini AFCK? Well yes, but I like it and I don't have a problem with rust. If we are all honest, the carbon steels are all in all better than the stainless steels, but are far more likely to rust. Take 3V or 10V for example, they are tougher/longer wearing than just about any Chromium stainless steel. It has always been my experience that a chrome content of around 13% and up makes a knife less tough and more brittle. Now is that down to over tempering these steels or an inherent weakness I cannot say. Just that has been my experience. For what its worth.

------------------
Wayne.
"To strive to seek to find and not to yield"
Tennyson
Ranger motto

A few useful details on UK laws and some nice reviews!
http://members.aol.com/knivesuk/
Certified steel snob!
 
Cliff,

What I said as far as the vanadium goes in CPM steel was told to me BY a knifemaker. It makes sense to me, but more than that, I can testify firsthand (as I own AND USE a knife made with CPM 420v, hardened to a rockwell of 55-56) that it holds a wicked edge, and keeps that edge LONGER than any knife I have ever used. And the rest of my knives are no slouches. Oh yeah, and I worked at a knife shop.

I may be an amatuer, although I HAVE made my own knives too, but I do know what I'm talking about here.

------------------
Marc
 
The effects of heat treatment on the microstructure, properties and characteristics of blade steel cannot be over emphasized. {Begin edit:]Neither can this subject be discussed often enough. So, BTTT.

[This message has been edited by samwereb (edited 05-01-2001).]
 
A great deal is made of crystal structure by some, generally those who use high-alloy steels in their knives, and those who market their knives as sharp pry bars, but there are others, sword makers who use simple carbon steels like 1074 or even lower carbon simple carbon steels for example, who use a method known as edge quenching which deliberately leaves a portion of the blade in the austenite crystal state for greater impact resistance. This seems to work perfectly well for a blade that will not be used as a pry bar.

Benchmade ATS-34 is a good case in point. Who knows what a metalurgical nightmare their heat treatment is in terms of breaking rules? Some folks decry that you cannot chop through metal with the edge without it chipping, and they are right. But others, such as myself, find the steel tough enough for cutting virtually anything non-metalic, and it holds an edge a waaaay long time. The bottom line is a really good blade with what I would not be surprised to find out possesses horrible grain structure relative to the ideal for ATS-34.

David Boye, in the heat treating instructions he provides with his cast 440C bar stock, recommends NOT cryogenically treating it because the finer grain structure may reduce the aggressiveness of the cutting edge.

I think a person has to evaluate every blade relative to its desired characteristics. Heat treatment is critical, but edge performance is the real bottom line, not grain structure. Though grain structure can certainly be examined as a basis for differences in performance or for acheiving a certain level of performance.

[This message has been edited by Steve Harvey (edited 05-01-2001).]
 
The simple non-stainless steels are pretty forgiving of heat treatment. If you don't have a bunch of chrome or other alloying elements the uniformity and relative softness the iron carbides makes sharpening easy and the steel ductile (rather than brittle). I think of high chrome (stainless) as a problem material for sharpening and strength. If you don't get a nice distribution of the chrome (if it is sort of lumpy) the steel won't be as ductile so it will be more brittle. It will also be a pain to sharpen since the edge will have bits of chrome and chromium carbides to break out. You need to worry about getting a nice pure stainless with a refined grain structure.
 
Lomic, it is trivial to show that the Vanadium carbides are not incomplete control of the cutting ability of the edge.

Take a hardened piece of steel and apply it to the edge of your knife above the angle it is sharpened at. Now press down hard and stroke along the edge, you will roll the edge completely over.

Now try to cut something with it and you will note the cutting ability has been significantly reduced. You have in no significant way effected the Vanadium carbides and this can be shown by repeating the process on the other side of the edge to straighten it out and this raising the cutting ability back to normal.

The same thing happens to all steels in use to some degree or another. The edge will go out of alignment because of lateral forces applied to the cutting edge, and thus significantly reduce the cutting ability. The ability of a steel to hold an edge is not simply determined by the carbides but by the properties of the steel matrix in which the carbides are held.

If a steel is 6 RC lower than another, in general, it is giving up a lot of strength and compression resistance and will indent readily as well as roll much more extensively than the harder steel. The ultra hard Vanadium carbides will not indent nor bend, but if they are not perpendicular to the cutting track they can do little in regards to the cutting ability and in fact just lower it by creating extra friction as they abrade the sides of the cut.

-Cliff
 
OK-here is some more stuff.
Higher Hardness= Higher Ultimate Tensile Strength.
HOWEVER-Higher Hardness=Lower Ductility
AND, knives are not loaded in tension-if the blade snaps, it's because of bending.
Pure tension is a beautiful thing. Materials are very strong if loaded this way. It's the bending that kills you.
Go too hard and things go "snap" instead of yielding when they are bent. Same goes for torsion. And, in bending, the precise amount of deflection becomes more critical-high hardness steels fail catastrophically and without warning. One second you're fine, the next it's broken.
If you consider the analagy to concrete, I believe you can draw some similarities to steel. If you have a fine aggregate, the concrete is stronger, and, it's more wear resistant.
My take is that finer grain AND clean grain boundaries=higher strength, better toughness and better sharpenability.
As to "grabby" edges, I have found that there are specific ways to sharpen steels that can increase or decrease this characteristic of the edge. That is, I view a "grabby" edge as something that results from my sharpening method moreso than from the microstructure of the blade.
Hope this helps,

RJ Martin
 
I am neither but I am not commenting as if I know steel chemistry either. You are all entitled to your opinions but Metalurgy is not football. It takes almost half a decade for formal training to really understand that stuff.
 
Cliff; what you say seems to make perfect sense, but if what you say is true, then why does Talonite cut so well. It is much softer than steel.

King Grinch. It is metallurgy. Two 'l's. Besides, there is a class of people, of which I am one, who know far more about metallic alloys than the two classes you mentioned. I am a dilettante.
wink.gif


Walt
 
I wouldn't expect most metallurgists to be reliable sources of information about what it takes to make a good knife edge. It is a very specialized expertise. I would expect a good metallurgist to be able to select a good cutting die material or durable paper slitting blade for factory applications or even a good wood chisel stock, but once you start a slicing stroke against stretchy-sticky elk tendon practical experience is best.

I've sharpened knives on a semi-professional basis since I was 12 (40 years ago). I've noticed a lot of subtle effects that you get from different alloys, from different makers, different blade contours, and different sharpening techniques. Many things I've observed disagreed with what I would expect from the couple of materials science classes that I've taken. I value the practical experience over the theory. A lot of the theory is sort of conjecture as to why things work the way that you've observed. I would expect many of our experienced users to have more accurate opinions on blade materials than 99% of the metalurgists in the world.
 
Some interesting points made here. Yes, there is metallurgy. Then, there is Engineering, the Applied Science. This is where the practical experience factor comes in. The Engineering of a knife is where one has the opportunity to mesh the design, materials and processing to bring out the best characteristics and minimize the shortcomings of the materials.
It's not enough to use XYZ alloy and assume it's going to make a superior knife just because it looks good on paper.
You have to consider the whole package.
The requirements of end-use drive desired properties in the knife. This leads to selection of materials and processing parameters (heat treat, in particular), as well as design parameters like blade thickness, grind style and edge geometry.
Then, after the successful execution of the design, there is testing and feedback from end users to see if the combination of the above has played out in the finished product as anticipated.
I always approach a promising new material with an attitude of guarded optimism. I hope if will perform like I expect, but, I also stay on the lookout for shortcomings and tradeoffs.
this is what keeps knifemaking interesting for me.

RJ Martin


 
Walt Welch:

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">if what you say is true, then why does Talonite cut so well. It is much softer than steel.</font>

I was talking about edge retention, which is not the same as cutting ability. I have used more than half a dozen blades made out of various Cobalt alloys, all of them showed the above behavior, indenting more readily than steel and the edge would roll much sooner.

As for cutting ability, that is a factor of geometry much more so than material. I can grind a blade out of mild steel and it will cut exceptionally well. The critical point is how will the scope of work be effected by the properties of the steel, ductility and toughness (great for mild steel), strength and wear resistance (horrible).


Some of the Cobalt blades I have used did cut very well, David Boyes Cobalt hunter for example, simply because of the geometry. The edge is down to 0.01", and sharpened at a decently acute angle. However, because of the weakness of the blade material, the edge would take damage readily even just cutting cardboard as compared to the same blade in 440C blade.

You can see the same behavior in the 440V blades at the relatively low hardness of about ~54 RC. There have been a number of reports now of people preferring the edge retention of ATS-34 at ~60 RC. Now the wear resistance of the 440V blade I would assume is much higher but its lower strength and impact resistance means the edge will deform readily as compared to a much harder steel. Talonite and the rest of the soft Cobalt alloys do the same thing.


R.J., when you say it is tougher, do you mean it can take a greater flex and a greater impact shock or something different?


-Cliff
 
Cliff: The toughness is greater because the finer carbides reinforce the matrix. With large, "boulder-like" carbides, there is more matrix (soft) in between the carbides.
In addition, finer grain size combined with cleanliness means grains that fit together more precisely=more strength and more toughness. Remember that the impurities collect at the grain boundaries-I have seen ATS34 micrographs with large grains and large carbides (bounders) and dirty grain boundaries. Now, this may not be true of all ATS, but, compared with the CPM or BG42 micrographs (small grains, very clean, small grain boundaries), there is a big difference.

RJ Martin
 
Jeremy, I have samples of all the steels you mention here except the 50100, 52100, and 0170-6C. Of the knives you mention, I would recommend you make your selection based on features of the knives other than the steel. There will be minor differences in edge holding, and some differences in toughness. But, they will be miniscule in the range that you are talking. All will hold a good edge a long time, none will hold a shaving edge extraordinarily long time, and there will be the obvious differences in stain resistance between "stainless" and "non-stainless" steel.

------------------
The most affectionate creature in the world is a wet dog. - Ambrose Bierce
Most dog owners are at length able to teach themselves to obey their dog. - Robert Morley


iktomi
 
Back
Top