None of you probably does not want to hear about my b.s. , but I'll write it down anyway.
Just to clear some confusion :
Sat. 10 through Tues. 13, - Send multiple e-mails to J. asking if he's shipped the knife yet. No responses, although I did notice him perusing the balisong forums.
--- I just do not check email during weekend, and for your information, last monday was Veteran day (long weekend). So, I went to out of town for couple of days. Perusing forum ---> my roomate. I don't mind her doing so, as long as she does not post anything in the forum. So far, it has been going on fine.
Wed. 14 - Get response from J. telling me that he got my package, but there was a problem with his shipping and that he had to resend it. Ok, I have my suspicions here, but I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt. He also tells me that he's cut himself with it (I don't think too much of this, but he will try to use this against me later).{2}
--- This happened before Andrew told me about cancelling the deal. I told him about my being cut merely because he was kind enough to send the one band aid and I wanted to tell him that his band aid was very useful. I appreciated what he did. Not other intention. Remember, this happened before the email about backing out of the deal. How could I have known that he was going to cancel the deal ?
Wed. 14, night time - I decide I don't like the smell of things and send an e-mail to J. stating that I am backing out of the trade all-together.
--- My package finally arrived last Friday/Saturday, seems I did not lie about sending the package after all. He was happy with the original deal (Monarch with BM), then got suspicious b/c my knife was late, then my package finnaly arrived. I agree with Cougar Allen about "If it arrives intact and you're satisfied with its condition, then you can send the Monarch to Joe and everything will be fine, won't it?". Don't you think ?? Andrew got what he wanted (originally), I get to keep the Monarch and do whatever to it (since it's mine now) and I don't have to spend any more money.
His email did not arrive <-- believe it or no, Internet can get messed up.
That folks, is his irrefutable proof that he did not foul this deal up. The flaw in your argument, J., is that past performance does not always predict future behavior, especially not in this case. He again claims that he's offended by my words because "It seems to ME that you set me up. You might have waited until I sent you email about my having played with the knives and then decided to cancel the trade."
--- Not trying to offend him, just explaining that there are many possibilities concerning this matter. He could suspect me of being not honest in his way. I could also suspect him of being dishonest in another way. So, instead of accusing me of anything, just wait and see if what I said was true.
I grudgingly accept the BM47 that he has pseudo-offered in a subsequent e-mail and await his reply (he's not usually speedy on e-mail replys unless it is to his advantage to do so, so I'm not holding my breath here)
--- Well, it was weekend, and I have another life beside collecting knives. Don't you guys have something you want to do on weekend instead of flipping bali ?? I'm sorry, but I did. I want to go to a mall for window shopping (more fun than actual shopping). I want to meet with my friends who study at different college. I want to have meal at 'fancy' restaurant with my girlfriend. I want to go to a movie. I have to clean my apartment (this is a MUST, definitely not a WANT). Don't you guys want or do any of those on weekend ? One more thing, it was MID TERM WEEK. I had to study and do papers. Just to write this email, it took me almost 2 hours - not to mention my change of mood here. If those things count for my 'advantages', then pardon me for those. I could not reply his email immediately because I had to go visit some friends (my girlfriend kept rushing me). I arrived at home late night, I was too tired and could not reply any emails either (I did not check any emails either). The next morning, VOILA, I found this whole thing on the forum.
Here we go... like the subject says, Joe Jurianto (lets call him J. from now on) CAN NOT be trusted.
--- I don't understand which part of my doing CAN NOT BE TRUSTED. This is what I've been doing :
Well, I admitted that I had damaged the knife at some degree.
I did send my knife to him, it was late though.
When Andrew asked me to give him some reimbursement, I did not agree about the amount only. The negotiation about how much the appropriate reimbursement was not finished yet. I said : $65 compensation is just absurd. <-- don't you think that I wanted to give him the compensation, but not agree to the amount ?
He did not get my replies for one day, and he put his whole thing at the forum. I'm not trying to blame him, but I'm just worried about my reputation.
I did not offer him to try to resolve this matter because I did not feel that I was in right position for bargaining.
So, what part is "CAN NOT BE TRUSTED" ? The only thing I did wrong was playing with the knife before he got mine. And I believe it is not just me that has been doing this practice.
"DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THIS FORUM ETTIQUETE", I could accept, but "CAN NOT BE TRUSTED" ?? You guys be the judge of me.
Since you guys are very interested in this matter (look at the 'view', almost 1,000 persons have viewed this post in a weekend

), I'll let you know about how this thing ends.
I agreed to pay the $65 today, and will do so after class. I'll let him know about the tracking number, I'll post it on the forum too.
Hopefully my explanation can restore my reputation a bit.
Joe