Big Smitty. This is not directed at you personally, but since you are making the post I am addressing this to you. Please don't get upset at the post. It is informative, not criticism. It is a general statement toward experimenting with HT.
I'm going to play Kevin for a minute here (So if I pi$$ you off, get mad at him

).
Why would you do something like quench O-1 in brine

. It is called
O-1 because it is an oil quench steel. The makers have $500,000,000 steel mills. They spend millions on research and development, they provide all this information
free to the ASM and to
you so you can nail the HT every time :thumbup:. BUT Nooooooo, someone says, "Hey, I did it and it worked. for me." So you tried it and it didn't work

. Go figure, those steel suppliers actually knew something about their product

.
Now, lets go a step farther. Suppose it did work? What would be the point? You could not gain anything more than over doing the HT with the proper rates and quencahant. Is a brine HT with micro-fractures
BETTER than a HT at the prescribed cooling rate? Or will the brine quench give the blade some mystic quality known only to a hermit in Tibet, allowing it to cut anvils in half? If any of the above are true please send the blade to Kevin so he can photo-micrograph the structures so the new metallurgy books can be written (since the old ones are clearly useless).
All this rant aside. It is never a good idea to vary the HT from the steel makers specs. They made it....they know it better than anybody. Follow their guidance and you can get all that is possible from the steel.
Again, please this is not a personal attack. You were just standing in the line of fire



Stacy