- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 745
Reality check here people. He whistled the Adams Family tune at them. That´s it. So what?
This case should have been dismissed. To prosecute "malicious whistling" is a complete waste of tax money.
Yeah, and whistling made the Titanic sink too. Gimme a break.
1) ok. the bloke has been served with an anti-social behavior order, which has instructed him to cease his behaviour, which is obviously causing distress to the people he is doing it to. this behaviour was deliberate, and one would assume that he became aware it was causing a problem before the ASBO came about, so continuing to do so was obviously continued with a degree of malice. when the ASBO was breached that is a crime in itself, and I understand that that is what he was put away for, not the whistling per se. that is worth the court's time, it's a breach of a court order.
2) it is entierly possible that the gentlemans behaviour was causing the woman and her family stress. stress can cause medical symptoms if it is continuous, as I understand it. the whistling itself wasn't causing the the problems directly, but it was because of the whisting and accompanying behaviour that the medical conditions may have occured.