Being the owner of 15 Benchmades, I've certainly run across some less than perfectly sharpened blades. The same holds true for every other maker that I've bought 3 or more knives from, including CRKT, Spyderco, Boker, Case, & Victorinox. I'm actually grateful for that - it led me to finally learn how to correctly sharpen edges. That's not an excuse, but I'd prefer to make something positive out of it.
Given the defensive nature that Benchmade's products have traditionally been geared to, thicker grinds make sense to me. And, with that grind, harder blades also make sense. I suspect, though I'll readily admit I have no hard evidence, that most BM chipping probably occurs on blade that have been re-profiled with a thinner edge. I've yet to experience chipping personally. I don't normally put my knives to hard use, so any knife would show less chipping in my hands as compared to someone using it harder.
I keep wondering a few things. Would the cost of a Benchmade knife go up noticeably if BM was to tighten the tolerances when a blade is ground? Would thinner grinds lead to more chipping? The answers are likely to be yes, in which case, I like things the way they are.
I suspect this topic will never go away...
------------------
Knowledge without understanding is knowledge wasted.
Understanding without knowledge is a rare gift - but not an impossibility.
For the impossible is always possible through faith. - Bathroom graffiti, gas station, Grey, TN, Dec, 1988
AKTI Member #A000831
[This message has been edited by Codeman (edited 12-13-2000).]