Benchmade volli vs spyderco paramilitary 2

Although I've never met anyone with a PM2 that didn't like it (most love it), after collecting a ton of knives I would say go with the one that your gut is pulling you toward. You won't be unhappy if you go with the one you're most drawn to.
 
How much do the gayle Bradley's run for i haven't put too much thought into a gayle bradley and I think it might really enjoy the blade. and question with the cpm m4. How's spydercos heat treat on the m4. Not sure if the heat treat makes the difference but my Benchmade 810 with get some corrosion pretty quickly along the edge and it never gets wet or moist. I live in the frikkin desert. If I'm not mistaken the gb is non coated right. How does it stack up on rust. I know for an edge and ability to hold it my contego exceeds all my other knives. Just the rust thing really bugs me. I keep them my knives clean and oiled too
 
Or what if I threw in a 707 sequel to the mix. I also could pick one of these bad boys up for 100 right now. How would u guys stack em up?

I have owned 5 PM2's, 1 707, and no Volli's because of the ergos/assist. I much prefer the 707 over both for an EDC but if it was going to be a hard use knife, my bet is the PM2 will be the better choice.
 
Yeah like a couple others said that video with the PM2 torture test is pointless. There is absolutely no reason to stab a folding knife through metal like that, or do half that shit. The tip is thin and sharp for a reason, and it wasn't for stabbing metal or prying. If he wanted to split the wood, he could have easily batoned with the knife, and it would have passed just fine.

Those videos are interesting, but they really don't say much about the quality of any knife. You'll notice if you watch all of them there is almost no knife that passes those insane spine whack tests. I watched probably 15 of those videos from one of those russian dudes and the only knife that didn't fail his spine whack test was the Adamas, and every other knife was a high end option from ZT, DPX, Benchmade, Lionsteel, etc. Basically all types of locks failed with the first or second whack because of how hard he is hitting the knife. It's just way unrealisic. He was literally tying his wrist to the knife with the paracord lanyard hole he made with the knives, and with ALL of his possible force he smacks the blade spine down onto a 2x4. With folding knives, you're dealing with a basically broken knife that locks together with some simple lock designs. They're designed to withstand realistic force and anything you may encounter typically. Those tests are just not realistic...

Not to mention, shaving 1/2 thick aluminum? WTf??? Why would you ever shave a shard of aluminum with a pocket knife? That crap just doesn't make sense, like I said can be interesting but often stupid. I don't know if that was in this particular video, but one of the russian guys I watch does that.

Both knives are cool but I like the PM2 better. If you were comparing the PM2 and the emissary it would be a harder choice for me.
 
Last edited:
Ya I completely agree I would never do those things with the knives nor are they necessary nor can I understand what the dudes are saying. What I take from them basically is a destruction test and I think that's kinda their point is to destroy the knives but see how long it takes and honestly in that vid the pm2 surprised me. The blade did break easy with left to right torque like that but it's kinda expected with the blade profile. I think I'm just gona get me a pm2 and see how it is. I have never owned a spyderco some how so I'm interested. And the one I'm buying is acid etched with micarta scales plus original scales for 120 so worst case I'm sure I can just flip it. Thank you again guys for all the info and input
 
Back
Top