Until you need to get out of your way to get a sheath...Cold Steel is the better value.
That's easy. Benchmade.Which do you prefer overall?
Benchmade versus Cold Steel is an easy choice for me: Cold Steel. It all boils down to the fact that I just don't like Benchmades, don't like their designs, don't like the fiddly Axis lock, just not a fan. And really, in this price range, I'd mainly be buying a knife for bumming around in the woods, breaking down boxes, and so on. For that, I'd just rather have a Cold Steel. Thinking about it, I have four specific CS knives (among the others I own) in mind as examples, an AD10, an AD20, a Recon 1, and an Ultimate Hunter. The Recon and UH in XHP, and the ADs in S35v and frankly, I wouldn't accept ANY Benchmade in trade for any of those four knives. It helps that not only are the CS knives more durable, and indestructible feeling, their ergos are better to me, and the fit and finish on the examples I bought were all great.
I am a pretty big "Buy American" guy, but despite the fact that these are made in Taiwan, yep, CS for me. Plus, LT is a character and a half. He's a doofus for sure, but I've met him a few times at various BLADE shows and he's always just so happy to be there and meeting people who want to buy his knives. I can appreciate that. Plus, Andrew Demko is on par with Emerson for designing knives that lock so completely into your hand.
Think you meant AD15 instead of AD20? But hopefully a CS AD20 will happen soon!
This was a satire question. Right?Which do you prefer overall? Taking everything into consideration (ie : quality , price , selection , fit and finish , lock mechanisms , steel etc).
I agree that Spyderco makes a great knife. And I own many. I just want a break from the hole.Spyderco beats them both imo.
I don't find cold steel appealing and Bechmade has a good warranty but I don't want to use a warranty.
A great knife that works, Spyderco is hard to beat.
Something I think you're missing is heat treatment and blade geometry. Cold steel does a lot of aggressive hollow grinds that outcut most competitive options, and they do a great job heat treating their steels, especially for their price points. A lot of people focus on the triad lock as a differentiator and miss how incredibly well some of their knives perform as actual cutting tools.I have to say, I have never quite gotten much out of the Cold Steel line up at least with respects to their folders. The biggest and only differentiating selling point is the tri-ad lock. By all accounts, it is virtually as close as you can get a folding knife to perform like a fixed blade. That being said, I don't carry a folding knife to do anything close to a fixed blade and I wouldn't expect it to. Additionally, anything under 4 inches in blade length isn't going to be very effective in battoning wood of any legitimate size anyways and once you get bigger than that its just as much of a hassle to carry a folder bigger than 4 inches as it is to scout carry a fixed blade of 4 inches. I'm sure someone will have a story here of when they needed their 3.5 inch folding knife to be able to punch through a car door for some reason but for me, the Axis lock (and frankly even liner locks) are more than enough to accomplish the legitimate cutting tasks anyone should expect out of a sub 4 inch folding knife.
Something I think you're missing is heat treatment and blade geometry. Cold steel does a lot of aggressive hollow grinds that outcut most competitive options, and they do a great job heat treating their steels, especially for their price points. A lot of people focus on the triad lock as a differentiator and miss how incredibly well some of their knives perform as actual cutting tools.