Benefits of "old timey" why do so many still carry and EDC?

The choice of a traditional knife for me, aside from the strong prejudice to them as its what I grew up with, is the choice of blades.

I tried the one hand knife a few times, and they failed to do the job for me. I carried the same Buck 301 stockman for 25 years, and the choice of three different blades with three different blade shapes and three different kind of edges, gave me a ton of versistlity in one small 3 7/8th inch package in my pocket. Even with a simple two blade pocket knife like a Barlow or trapper, I still have two different blades to use for different jobs.

The aesthetics of the traditional is a draw to me as well. I just can't get into the stark and sometimes weird styles of the so called tactical one handers. The blades seem so blunt and thick compared to what I've been using met whole life, that when I try one it seems overly clumsy. Its rare I need a blade lock, and if I feel I am going to be doing something that may cause a slip joint to close on me,(?what I don't know) then I use the original one hand knife that won't fold; a fixed blade. My usual small slip joint pocket knife that I carry is on occasion augmented by my Buck 102 woodsman or the small Finnish Puuko with a 4 inch blade.

Then theres the small slip joints with some tools on them like SAK's. It gives you a level of utility that its hard to not get used to with screw driver, bottle opening, can opening and awl on a pocket knife. I've long lost track of things I've hd to fix in the middle of nowhere and having a SAK or scout knife made it a lot easier to get back. A conked out motor scooter on a dirt road miles from anywhere, an electric trolling motor with a control handle that fell apart and needed the deep set Phillips crew replaced, a fishing reel that needed some work on a remote lake shore.

I like a small pocket knife that I can just drop in a pocket and forget about it until I need to cut something. Some of my favorite knives over the past 50 years has been a stockman, Buck 303 cadet, Case peanut, Case mini copperhead, Puma Junior, Boker 240 penknife, and an old Christy knife. I've never been under knifed yet. I've nerf needed one hand opening or a lock on the blade yet, in spite of a lot of backpacking, fishing, some hunting, canoe camping, and 50 years of Harry homeowners projects.

In short, the small size that you can forget its there, the choice of different blades, and some nice materials like real stag, jigged bone, good looking wood like rosewood and iron wood, are nice. Aesthetics, conveyance, versatility, practicality.
 
For some people the answer might because because they use their knives in environments where modern knives might be frowned upon or considered scary, whereas a traditional knife doesn't get a second look. This is not my reasoning at all. For me, it simply boils down to carrying and using what I enjoy. I liken it to watches to some extent. Many would point out that a G-Shock or Garmin is ideally suited for outdoor activities, and they wouldn't be wrong. However, I'm at a point where I enjoy mechanical watches, and I want something I enjoy to accompany me on my adventures. Items I can one day look back on with reverence as a keepsake of those adventures. Likewise, I carry a traditional knife regularly because I think they are cool, and I like having another cool knife on me as I live my life.

I haven't always felt this way, I used to be exclusively in to modern folders. I'm fairly new to carrying traditional knives, and I like to carry modern knives along with traditionals. For the longest time I had little appreciation for traditional knives. I considered them silly little knives fit only for Elmer Fudd and the likes. I'm not sure exactly when my opinion changed, or even why I eventually embraced the traditional; I just know that they started to appeal to me. Is it due to age and nostalgia? I'm only 44 but maybe. Is it just the fact that as I knife collector I had experienced modern folders to an extent that I was looking for something new to me? Perhaps. Or perhaps it was just a way to expand my obsession with blades and have more knives. If so that's fine with me. I do know that embracing traditional knives alongside modern folders has opened up a whole new world in the hobby for me, and I'm glad for it.

On a side note, lever-action rifles have caught my eye as of late as well.
 
Why not both?

w1z9n9B.jpg


Really not sure how to feel about this.

I feel all twisted between my brain and heart. Some things like.this pic are better left not shown.
 
I like both traditional and modern knives. I've noticed traditional knives tend to fill the hand better, whereas modern knives are often flat. Hence, traditional knives are better for prolonged work, like whittling and modern knives are more suited to carrying (and cutting just a few times a day).

Also, traditional knives are often less scary to non-knife people. Modern knives that deploy rapidly can be intimidating to those people.
 
I like the old stockmen for whittling: Boker King Kutter I carried for years until the blades were worn down by about 1/3, and Schrade Old Timer 80T... Come to think of it, I'd qualify for Old Timer myself now, but still sharp:D.
 
Aesthetics of simplicity and form. Carry-ability. Acceptable by most of society.

Nostalgia. To me, they come from an age where a handshake was a contract, hard work garnered success and your word was all you needed.

That's probably sappy to some. But I don't care.
 
I think a lot of it is what works best for you. I've carried pretty much everything, all the big names, etc. But I found I really didn't need a blade over 4" for day to day stuff. And frankly most blades over 3" tend to be too thick to slice really well. And for opening packages, digging out splinters, sharpening a pencil (yes I still use them in the woodshop), and chores of that nature a small, pointy, blade is much more useful and easier to control. I don't need a lock, I know how to cut stuff, and frankly I don't want anything huge in my pockets.

This is my favorite carry: 3" straight blade for slicing, 1.5" pen for small stuff. It looks good, it sharpens easy and keeps an edge, and it will outlast me, easy.
LgvZEFV.jpg


If you've never carried a slipjoint let me offer a suggestion; get one of these. It's a Wharncliff by Rough Ryder, they're cheap, sharp, and I'll bet if you carry one for a while you'll find yourself leaving those larger knives at home. If not, you're not out anything.
fDbSz35.jpg
 
I want to start by saying this post in no way is meant to upset anyone or start a fight. Im genuinely curious about the appeal/ place of vintage style folders in the modern world of knives. I understand the nostalgia of collecting knives that you had as a kid, but are they really practical to carry these days with all the new styles and ease of flippers? Again, im not trying to start a "modern vs vintage" fight, im just wondering why so many still choose to carry an "oldtimey" as their day to day user, when there's so many options that make the edc jobs easier. I do understand why people collect these knives, great designs and materials and such, just wondering why so many choose to edc them. For those that do carry an old school, whats your reason for not wanting to go modern, and what are the benefits of not having a pock clip or fast opening blade. This might be a dumb question that bubbles down to pure taste and just preferring the feeling of the old knives, but its just something I've wondered. Please don't let this turn into a fight about modern vs vintage, I just want to hear from those that do stick to older styles and hear why.

For me, tradition, nostalgia, or pretty handles have nothing to do with it. I carry traditional pocket knives because they work better than most modern designs for most of my cutting jobs. That's not to say that I don't carry modern designs. I have a Spyderco Native 5 in my back pocket as I sit here. But I also have a 1979 Gerber Silver Knight slipjoint in my front pocket. I usually carry both traditional and modern because I'm a knife knut and I can. It's fun to carry a big honking folder. They aren't useful for fine cutting, but they are fun to carry.

I'm getting on toward 70. I don't need a "fast opening knife". I need a knife with a sharp blade that has a useful blade shape.

♦ Traditional knives offer the choice of multiple blade shapes which are optimized for specific cutting jobs.
♦ Modern knives tend to have one large large blade and you have to use what you got with you that day.
Most of my traditional knives have multiple blades, so I can pick from several shapes to pick the one which will work best for the job at hand. (If you ever want a blade that is useful for opening clamshell packaging, pick up a stockman and use the sheepsfoot blade. The harder you push the point into the clamshell, the more you are forcing the blade open. It won't slip and it cannot close on your hand.)

♦ Traditional blades tend to be thin and narrow.
♦ Modern blades tend to be wide and thick.
Most of my cutting jobs require precision cutting. A narrow thin blade is more useful.
It's been my experience that most modern knives with small thin blades, also have small thin handles. The small handles make it more difficult to control the blade and are not comfortable.

With slipjoint knives, I never worry about how strong the lock is or how reliable it is. I just use the knife the way my father taught me and all is well.

You asked.
 
For me, the main draws of the slipjoint/"traditional" are:

1) They are ... unlikely" ... to be considered or viewed as a "weapon" by Mr. and Mrs. John D. Public.
(Who just happen to be terrified of their own shadows, thanks to "Hollywood" and the far left liberal media).

2) "Speed of Deployment" does not concern me. I don't "deploy" my knives, to begin with. I am a (old and retired) civilian, and none of my knives are a "weapon".
If I require something for up close and personal defense, I have the proper tools for that. The gods willing, I'll never have cause to use them again.
I cannot think of anything worse than a knife for self defense, without a lot of training and constant practice. Both of which I lack.
True, a flipper or automatic can be opened and ready for use in under a second. So What? It only takes a second or two to open a slipjoint. What's the rush? In over 60 years, I've never needed the knife opened sooner. If I ever did, I'd probably carry a non-folding knife, that is ready for use as soon as it is out of the sheath. Faster even than a flipper or automatic.

3) Fact of "life": no single blade profile/type is "ideal" for every task.
A Sheepsfoot and Wharncliffe, for example, are great for fine controlled cuts. Honestly though, they both suck rotten eggs or worse, when it comes to peeling a critter, for example.

The "traditionals" I carry in my pocket all have multiple blades of various profiles/types. I've had a stockman and 4 blade scout/camp/"Demo"/"G.I. Utility Knife" or a 2 or 3 layer SAK in my pocket 24/7/365.25 since 1963.
On days I knew I'd be doing something different, such as working with rope, I'd add a Marlin Spike.

A Old Timer 6OT/70T or Buck 110 has been on my belt pretty much 24/7/365.25 since 1968 or 1969.
(I did carry a Western L66 or Old Timer "Sharp Finger" hunting knife or 2 blade slipjoint folding hunter a few times when I went hunting or hiking though.) I've never felt "under knifed"

As for what I'm carrying now?
A 1978-1982 vintage Old Timer 7OT with a 1095 blade is on my belt.
A 1978-1986 vintage Old Timer 858 "Lumberjack" stockman (only just 4 5/8 inch closed no "OT" on the tang stamp) is (loose) in my right front pocket.

A new offshore manufactured Old Timer 23OT 4 blade "Scout" knife is in my primary rollator's tote bag.

I don't foresee any changes in my EDC until after December 31, 2020. :D

View attachment 1451210
 
Last edited:
.....As for what I'm carrying now?
A 1978-1982 vintage Old Timer 7OT with a 1095 blade is on my belt.
A 1978-1986 vintage Old Timer 858 "Lumberjack" stockman (only just 4 5/8 inch closed) is (loose) in my right
Vic Small Tinker for me. Don't normally need anything larger to be quite honest about it. But I like them all. The "all" just seldom gets used. Like knarfeng knarfeng I have carried the Native 5 and anther favorite is the Benchmade Mini Presidio II. Both technically can be opened one handed but I don't think I have ever done so unless I was just fooling around.

I often carry a fixed blade out in the woods. The particular knife varies. Like I said, I like them all!
 
Great topic for a thread Weasipoint Weasipoint ,


Slip a SAK or traditional slip joint in your pocket for a week , and then maybe find yourself wondering why so many people carry these modern folding knives.:)
5ES2uHD.jpg

I couldn't agree more, I've come full circle in my fairly short time on this rock (I'm 32). I started with an uncle Henry stockman, moved to a Spyderco native (circa 2007), lost a Benchmade deja Vu (one of the worst times in my life), went with a pm2 in s30v. Then after leaving my job for self employment, started experimenting with sheath knives... Came back to a folder in the aforementioned Douk Douk, supplemented by an SAK and small pliers. I keep a sheath knife in my bag that rides along in whatever vehicle I'm in. The sebenza I mentioned in my last post currently rides along in a jacket pocket with the hope that maybe I'll become as attached to it as I have my slip joints... I can't argue that it's perhaps one of the finest built knives I've ever owned, but I'm having a hard time getting the attachment to it that I've experienced with knives that have a bit more easily expressed "personality" so to speak.

Edited to add: Pocket clips don't work for me personally because of their predisposition to snagging on climbing saddles and bucket harnesses, my solution to that problem has been a short fob with a carabiner clipped to a belt loop.
 
Because, they’re just so damn sexy looking and serve a purpose. How many modern folders are covered with ram’s horn or stag? The old timey knives haven’t gone away because there’s still a demand for them. Thin is in. :)
It’s also a good reminder that if you treat your locking blades as you would your non locking blades, then the chances of getting hurt are far less than those that think a locking blade won’t fail.
 
Back
Top