I have to admit that this is pretty entertaining. But fair enough, I shouldn't have said "knock off," which I suppose has a lot of bad connotations. But if you read anything else that I wrote, I think that it's pretty clear what I want:
something that makes a similar sort of knife (with similar quality and functionality) but is not charging for the spyderco name. I'm not looking for a fake, crappy watch with a rolex label on it or stolen property. Give me a break.
I think my analogies make this pretty clear. If "knock off" is interpreted the way that people are interpreting it above, then sigma is not a "knock off" of nikon, and Bark River is not a "knock off" of, let's say, Fallkniven (yes I'm sure there aer flaws in the analogy, but the idea is that Bark River tries to offer the same quality that other manufacturer's charge more for ... and that doesn't make it a thieving company that should be boycotted).
The idea that Spyderco should have some sort of perpetual monopoly on anything that approaches its knife designs is pretty silly to me. That isn't the way that intellectual property rights work, and it isn't the way free markets should work. IP rights should be the exception, and they shouldn't cover sweeping designs and concepts, but rather very specific innovations. I'm sorry but I just must not be as much of a fan of governmental meddling in the free market as the rest of you
There do seem to be some good recommendations in all of this, I still need to ferret them out. Some of the more reasonable posts do make me think that maybe there just is no manufacturer that fits my description, which surprises me, since, like I said, I do think Spyderco definitely has the ability to get more of a profit margin based on its good name (anyone who doubts that should just read the parade of spyderco love letters in this thread).