Just curious why Hondas are recommended so much more than briggs and stratton?
Because Honda's engines are better-built, run more quietly, and run longer on the same amount of fuel. I'd rather a B&S than a Tecumseh,
by far, but I'd take a Honda over a B&S. In fact: I paid bit extra for my 5HP Toro snow-blower to get the Suzuki (IIRC) engine as it was the better engine.
Hate to say it, but Honda gasoline-powered products in just about all categories (generators, lawn-mowers, power washers, etc.) are just about the best money can buy. As I noted earlier: A company called Generac made their own OHV engines, simlar to Honda's small engines. Generac claimed their engines were just as fuel-efficient as, and even quieter than Honda's. Generac has since been purchased by Briggs & Stratton. I called Generac yesterday and asked if they still built those OHV engines here in the U.S. Woman claimed they did.
If B&S has/had any sense, they'll keep their hands off Generac's engine-building operations. But if history is any guide: They'll destroy it. That's been the pattern here in the U.S. for the last several decades: Mediocre company beats and buys company selling superior product and destroys the superior product. Then mediocre company's products get beaten by off-shore competition, and mediocre company either goes out of business or gets bought by off-shore competition.
Odd thing is (to me, anyway), that company owners, stock-holders, employees, union "leaders," the government, and customers can't seem to see the pattern. Ah well, FoMoCo's about to fall to Toyota, and GM may follow. Maybe
then everybody'll wake up. (I'm not holding my breath.)