Hello Guys,
Chris (Hesparus) - I look forward to seeing and training with you soon! On the training and EDC issue, the are definite merits to having both your trainer and EDC to be the same, familiarity with the feel, handle or grip, edge orientation, weight distribution, sheathing/hosltering position etc. I do this with any weapon I may carry, and often have trainers made up to simulate the weapon for EDC to practice on/with. But, there also is a flaw in this theory; that is familiarity also breeds contempt. Here is a shooting example: If I only shoot a Glock, what happens when I have to shoot a Colt? Am I familiar with how it operates? What about the safety? Grip and weight distribution etc. In the realm of an edged weapon, how many of us actually practice throwing a normally carried weapon? Many people become so emotionally/psychologically attached to their one "tool" that they have difficulty adapting to a combat situation under stress. As an example, most Elite military or Law Enforcement groups have a particular carry weapon, that is shared with all members of the group, this allows members to share ammunition, or even weapons if needed, but they are also pushed outside of their comfort zone to learn other weapons uses, strengths and weaknesses.
This is the underlying theory, "push ourselves outside of our comfort zone."Become familiar with many theories, as well as actual practice, and do it with a non cooperative opponent/partner. If we look at Col. Applegate's development and blade design, he chose a design to enhance the ability of the soldier carrying his weapon on the battlefield. Fixed blade, double edged etc., later he modified it to be a folder with a false edge for EDC use for civilian carry. Yet, he also worked on the Smatchet, various shooting methods and empty hand techniques as well. Always pushing himself outside of his comfort zones to improve his skills or tools.
As for your blade design, still a very nice blade, keep up the great work!
Gumagalang
Guro Steve L.
www.Bujinkandojo.net