- Joined
- Aug 27, 2012
- Messages
- 1,238
It's all about perspective, sort of like when someone asks for recommendations on an "affordable" or "inexpensive" knife without expanding on what their actual price range is. My beater knives are, for the most part, cheap Chinese knives bought online or at a hardware store with no regard for quality. By far, the two knives I use the most are Guidesman folders bought at the local Menard's store for around $5 each. I have to sharpen them frequently and tighten the pivot screws, but they are flawless in terms of actual construction. For quite some time, my only EDC knife was an $8 MTech, which never failed me despite horrible blade centering. In contrast to that, I had a $15 Smith & Wesson "Extreme Ops" knife fall apart in my hand when I opened it. As the price doubles, the quality does not; in these cases, it got worse.
That being said, these are not knives with any collector value or a reasonable expectation of long-term durability. They are not classic designs proven over decades, nor are they built with any particular concern to edge retention, ease of sharpening or corrosion resistance. They're just cutting tools, and cheap ones at that. They would not be made better simply by adding a Benchmade or Kershaw logo, but those are brands with established reputations, for whom quality control is not simply an afterthought, even on Chinese knives. If one of my Guidesman knives falls apart, I'll be disappointed like I would be about any broken tool, but I wouldn't feel as though I was let down by a respected manufacturer. If a $150 Benchmade or ZT failed under routine light use, well, I'd be a bit pissed . . . but I'd also feel confident that if it was due to a flaw in materials or workmanship, they'd make it right.
That's the difference - the expectation level.
That being said, these are not knives with any collector value or a reasonable expectation of long-term durability. They are not classic designs proven over decades, nor are they built with any particular concern to edge retention, ease of sharpening or corrosion resistance. They're just cutting tools, and cheap ones at that. They would not be made better simply by adding a Benchmade or Kershaw logo, but those are brands with established reputations, for whom quality control is not simply an afterthought, even on Chinese knives. If one of my Guidesman knives falls apart, I'll be disappointed like I would be about any broken tool, but I wouldn't feel as though I was let down by a respected manufacturer. If a $150 Benchmade or ZT failed under routine light use, well, I'd be a bit pissed . . . but I'd also feel confident that if it was due to a flaw in materials or workmanship, they'd make it right.
That's the difference - the expectation level.