If a distributor is forced to have a price floor
I think they will offer "tie ins" to make THEIR price more attractive
For example, "Get a free sheath and sharpening stone with purchase"
What is the "penalty" for selling below the MSRP?
BM will no longer "authorize" you to distribute it?
Say the MSRP is 100 bucks
I go into Joe Bob's Knife Shack and make a deal to buy 10 knives at 80 bucks a piece
Then I sell them on EBAY for 90 bucks
How will BM
know where I got the knives from and "punish" Joe Bob for selling below the MSRP?
To me it hinges
how far off the MSRP is from the ACTUAL "market value" of the knife
There will either be
consumer surplus or
producer surplus
A price floor set above the market equilibrium price has several side-effects. Consumers find they must now pay a higher price for the same product. As a result, they reduce their purchases or drop out of the market entirely. Meanwhile, suppliers find they are guaranteed a new, higher price than they were charging before. As a result, they increase production.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resale_price_maintenance
It looks like the legality is based on the
rule of reason
Given its policy of refusing to sell to retailers that discount its goods below suggested prices, petitioner (Leegin) stopped selling to respon-dents (PSKS) store. PSKS filed suit, alleging, inter alia, that Leeginviolated the antitrust laws by entering into vertical agreements withits retailers to set minimum resale prices. The District Court ex-cluded expert testimony about Leegins pricing policys procompeti-tive effects on the ground that Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co., 220 U. S. 373, makes it per se illegal under §1 of the Sherman Act for a manufacturer and its distributor to agree on the minimum price the distributor can charge for the manufacturers goods. At trial, PSKS alleged that Leegin and its retailers hadagreed to fix prices, but Leegin argued that its pricing policy was law-ful under §1. The jury found for PSKS. On appeal, the Fifth Circuitdeclined to apply the rule of reason to Leegins vertical price-fixing agreements and affirmed, finding that Dr. Miles per se rule rendered irrelevant any procompetitive justifications for Leegins policy.
Held: Dr. Miles is overruled and vertical price restraints are to be judged by the rule of reason. Pp. 528.
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/06-480.pdf
I really don't think this will be good for the knife consumer

It reeks of cartel like behavior
If BM sees of reduction of revenue and/or profit===>
I'm sure they will reverse the policy
It will be interesting to see the sales figures (if they are publicly available)
Then again
Maybe "cutting out the middle man" will allow them to LOWER the prices
You never know......
