- Joined
- Feb 1, 2007
- Messages
- 314
The Boye dent is put on a lot of Spyderco knives but not on the Manix series or the Chinook. Why is that?
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
My guess would be that the Dent would weaken the lock-strength rating on the Chinooks and Manixs, which are MBC (the highest) rated.
Regards,
3G
How do you figure that?
Just a guess. I can't figure out any other reason why the dent would be absent in those two giants (the Chinook and Manix), and Spyderco always has a reason for doing (or not doing) things.
Regards,
3G
When did the Boye Dents come around in Spyderco knives? Is it possible that those models are older than the Boye Dent? Because I could have sworn that the Sprint Run FG Manixes had the dents. Edit: No, it doesn't; nvm...
If you were to pick up the old designs sans Boye Dent and squeeze them in a gorilla grip (really, the only appropriate grip in a knife fight, in my not-so-humble opinion), you might notice the lock starting to give way. I could do that with my old SS Endura and SS Police. Can't do it with the Boye Dent equipped versions, but I could never do it with my Chinook. The lock was just too strong, so I guess Sal and friends decided it didn't need it.
But one thing is for sure: the presence of the dent does not, in any way, weaken the lock. I think it's a great idea for the knives that need it.
Just a guess.
The CH3 lock button is not wide enough to need a dent. The dent is also more needed on thinner knives because the CH3 has the wide G10 grips they keep you from hitting the grip.
Sabre grip is definitely my favourite MBC grip. You risk spraining your thumb but you gain a lot of control over the blade
we're wtill learning.
sal
I'm guessing that there is a tollerance issue with all of those Persians. I would guess that they are making the catch or tooth of the lock to deep/long. To bad they don't have screws. On the others, you are not considering that the point of closing could happen sooner of there was a force applied to the blade.Even more puzzling to me is the fact that on some knives with Boye dents, lock release occurs long before the dent "bottoms out" in the lock well, while others require it to be depressed below the scales/liners, as illustrated by the photo below.
[
In the case of the C83 Persian, the glint of metal you see is not the lock bar, it's the off-side liner. Now, that particular Persian is an extreme case, but none of my six unlock with anywhere near as much lockbar showing as the Police III, Endura, or even the Stretch II in that photo. The Persian, unfortunately for me, gets a "double whammy", the lock spring is also one of the stiffest on any Spyderco.
Paul
My guess is that the dents are added to the the lockbar by hand. My "evidence" for that is strictly circumstantial, but there are models (like the C83) where I have a sufficient number of specimens to detect relatively gross differences in the dent's depth, location, and orientation between them. As for the "others" am not sure what you are saying. I'm not sure I agree with your idea that pressure on the blade would change the release depth but if the blade released sooner, the distance between the bottom of the dent and the bottom of the lock well would be even greater. As for screws, don't think I'd ever monkey around with modifying lock engagement depth and they'd sure as hell ruin the looks of the knife.I'm guessing that there is a tollerance issue with all of those Persians. I would guess that they are making the catch or tooth of the lock to deep/long. To bad they don't have screws. On the others, you are not considering that the point of closing could happen sooner of there was a force applied to the blade.