The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Yep, i know it's still a "sacred cow", no matter how many cheap, flawed products they pump out in China. Decent technical, constructive advice: don't buy Cold Steel products, they were good in the past, but the new ones are unreliable.
This happened sometime ago, i never got in touch with cold steel regarding this i won it on an aution site but it was unused, as mentioned the NDT guy where i work said the tang at some point had been welded on, if you look close you can just see it under the coating, this would have otherwise been consealed under the handle. I took the rest of the tang out of the handle, removed the remaining coating off the tang, V preped it, purged the back with argon and welded it up myself, i think it was AMS 5822 i used as filler wire. My friend has had it since then where its remained in active service . Intacted
...what is exactly Carbon V?...
I'm going to side a little bit with Amiga here but without too much generality. The carbon V blades seem to have a great reputation. Alternatively, in the 2.5 years since I've been hanging around this forum I've seen more reports of broken cold steel knives than any other single manufacturing company. I'm told this has to do with the large market share they hold: sell many, many knives and even a small defect proportion gets reported often. However, it does seem rare to see broken bucks. You see the odd kabars broken but less frequently IMO than cold steel.
Perhaps there is a more of pattern to the breaks in terms of types of steels and/or models that are susceptible that would be a fun little project to research. Perhaps my memory is biased in thinking the way I do but it seems like a legitimate critique to me. Too bad carbon V is no longer available. Is SK-5 equivalent to Carbon V???
Now, all that being said- I have an observation- almost all the time when I see a non-abusive breakage like this one in a blade, it is a hidden tang and near the hilt. I've tried hard to make sure my hidden tangs are beefy, but why do yall think this particular thing happens?
Carbon V is just a trade name and not a specific steel specification.
It is often speculated the original Carbon V is 50-100B, I high carbon steel alloyed with chromium and vanadium.
Developed as a ball bearing steel it had the toughness to make a very good hard use knife blade.
Also know as 0170-6, It has been referred to as 1095 Cro-Van or 1095CV.
50-100B is one of my favorite steels for big choppers.
But what other steels have been called Carbon V is any ones guess, as it really is just a marketing term.
Big Mike
Scaring the tree huggers.
Forest & Stream
Perhaps there is a more of pattern to the breaks in terms of types of steels and/or models that are susceptible that would be a fun little project to research. Perhaps my memory is biased in thinking the way I do but it seems like a legitimate critique to me. Too bad carbon V is no longer available. Is SK-5 equivalent to Carbon V???
Now, all that being said- I have an observation- almost all the time when I see a non-abusive breakage like this one in a blade, it is a hidden tang and near the hilt. I've tried hard to make sure my hidden tangs are beefy, but why do yall think this particular thing happens?
the OP I think said that there was a weld in the tang
its possible that the welded area wasnt let cool on its own but quenched to cool the weld and it could have been a bit brittle at that spot . my theory anyway .. I dont know for sure .
This happened sometime ago, i never got in touch with cold steel regarding this i won it on an aution site but it was unused, as mentioned the NDT guy where i work said the tang at some point had been welded on, if you look close you can just see it under the coating, this would have otherwise been consealed under the handle. I took the rest of the tang out of the handle, removed the remaining coating off the tang, V preped it, purged the back with argon and welded it up myself, i think it was AMS 5822 i used as filler wire. My friend has had it since then where its remained in active service . Intact.
I think he said he welded the broken knife together and it has worked since then.
The CS warranty might not apply in this instance anyway- I think it is 5 years limited warranty on fixed blades for the original purchaser. Not that I wouldn't try in this instance, but if the knife has been welded back together, no point.
SK-5 is, basically, plain carbon steel at 0.8-0.9% carbon and minor additions, So it is something like 1085.My understanding is SK-5 is a 1095 steel from Japan.