SpySmasher
Lead Guitar
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
- Messages
- 5,016
Rule number one of any review should be: post a bunch of pictures.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Rule number one of any review should be: post a bunch of pictures.
So, Frotier76, you want us to Google YouTube videos of someone else talking about a knife you're reviewing? What if the video we get doesn't like your knife? You've created a wall of text without documenting your observations. That tends to put the review into the TLDR category...just some friendly advice.Rule number one of any review should be: post a bunch of pictures.
Very true it is helpful...so is YouTube.
In on two!
So, Frotier76, you want us to Google YouTube videos of someone else talking about a knife you're reviewing? What if the video we get doesn't like your knife? You've created a wall of text without documenting your observations. That tends to put the review into the TLDR category...just some friendly advice.
I don't like waved knives and I don't like knives with fat round handles. The forced mid-grip handle choil looks uncomfortable. It could cause some prolonged-use ergo issues. A couple of pictures I've seen online made the liner lock look suspect with poor engagement. A picture of the lock-up on your specimen might have helped. I couldn't find a definite weight listed for the knife (woulda been a nice part of the review), but from appearances it looks to be way out of my maximum EDC weight range.
I'm glad the 1602 worked for you but it wouldn't work for me. I don't see myself as a Brother customer regardless of how much I like or dislike their products. I'm always open to the idea of a former clone company trying to go legit, but it would a long time going legit before I'd consider making a purchase from a cloner. If this is a first attempt for Navy/Brother to make original designs, I'd call that a good start. They can follow up with discontinuing their clones of Spyderco knives and devote themselves to design and development. Stealing is always cheaper than design or development and should be considered when crowing about the "value" of a knife brand.
I hope you enjoy your knife. Watch that liner lock.
I actually didn't praise Brother/Navy as any kind of value for making clones other than a generalization of who the brand is.Clones are a completely different topic that I won't engage in because everyone has different feelings about them.Originality will put a brand on the map as the 1602 model certainly is.I'd say if Brother can generate at least 4 or 5 original models this good over the years they will definitely put themselves on the map.
Well regarding the choil grip it's entirely preference related.It's a feature one takes a look at and decides right off the bat if they want/need it or not.I personally like it for a lot of precision cutting and is very useful for skinning game.Some great knives like the Gerber Metolius and Myth Series,Kershaw 1030 Deer Hunter,Uncle Henry 162UH Wolverine,and Old Timer 156OT Lil' Finger wouldn't be quite as effective without a choil grip.
I actually didn't praise Brother/Navy as any kind of value for making clones other than a generalization of who the brand is.Clones are a completely different topic that I won't engage in because everyone has different feelings about them.Originality will put a brand on the map as the 1602 model certainly is.I'd say if Brother can generate at least 4 or 5 original models this good over the years they will definitely put themselves on the map.
Next time just send a message to the OP. This thread has sunk and was resurrected by you for a question directed to him alone. A question about a knife ("clone" brands as a whole) that has raised some intriguing points of view on the knife industry, the world, and how the knife community should operate in a moral sense.Frotier76,
How is the detent on yours? I just received mine and its quite weak. I really have to flick my index finger hard or engage a little wrist flick to get the blade out. I can actually flick it open without touching the blade.
Also, mine happened to come open in my pocket, giving me a nasty gash in my finger when I went to retrieve it.
Frotier76,
How is the detent on yours? I just received mine and its quite weak. I really have to flick my index finger hard or engage a little wrist flick to get the blade out. I can actually flick it open without touching the blade.
Also, mine happened to come open in my pocket, giving me a nasty gash in my finger when I went to retrieve it.
Next time just send a message to the OP. This thread has sunk and was resurrected by you for a question directed to him alone. A question about a knife ("clone" brands as a whole) that has raised some intriguing points of view on the knife industry, the world, and how the knife community should operate in a moral sense.
All of this is now rehashed to ask if a detent is loose.
Just a quick bit of insight.
I would be willing to bet that a company that is so brazen to use another companies design without consent (steal), would also be brazen enough to not care about dialing in a detent to keep Your fingers safe.
Last time I checked Bill two of the most popular under $50 folders that were USA made had the most problematic liner-lock up I've ever seen...
*The Buck 345 Vantage Select won't even lock if you center the blade.You have to keep the blade pretty offset to deploy smoothly and lock-up enough.
*I've seen several Kershaw Skylines with way too early lock-up with only 50% of the liner lock width actually going under the blade base.
Being that you're making it a point not to engage on the thread of the Brother 1602 Knife...you're here to 'rabble-rouse'.The point is Bill USA manufacturers aren't immune from making QC flaws anymore that any country of origin...except people are paying more for it.
I am not here to "rabble-rouse", I was clearly stating that you broke the rules. If you disagree, then reread them. Necromancy of a thread is Highly discouraged and it against the rules. Either create a new thread linking this one within your post for background, or send a message.Last time I checked Bill two of the most popular under $50 folders that were USA made had the most problematic liner-lock up I've ever seen...
*The Buck 345 Vantage Select won't even lock if you center the blade.You have to keep the blade pretty offset to deploy smoothly and lock-up enough.
*I've seen several Kershaw Skylines with way too early lock-up with only 50% of the liner lock width actually going under the blade base.
Being that you're making it a point not to engage on the thread of the Brother 1602 Knife...you're here to 'rabble-rouse'.The point is Bill USA manufacturers aren't immune from making QC flaws anymore that any country of origin...except people are paying more for it.
Seems like a nice knife, although not exactly my cup of tea.
I think I'd like it more if it was slimmer, lighter and came without the wave function.
Seems like a nice knife, although not exactly my cup of tea.
I think I'd like it more if it was slimmer, lighter and came without the wave function.
That's funny, I've had over 75 different Skylines go thru my hands and I've never seen the lock-up you're describing. Do you have a picture?
I have seen problems with the Buck Vantage but they're not centering related, they're overall F/F related.
View attachment 735195
Just for validation, here's a group of "keepers".