For some reason, I get emails from the Washington Post. They even seem to remember who I am when I read the links, as I'm not asked to sign in, and this despite erasing all my cookies from the machine routinely.
Hardly a conservative paper, but interesting at times, and every so often, even with enough guts to go against the NY Times.
So there's a list of recent articles. In one, I learn this is the dirtiest political year yet, and the Republicans are the most at fault, because they are desperate. I'm not happy with elected officials who predate on young teens, but note there have been Democrats who had sex with pages and there were no consequences. And I'm not even thinking of Clinton. So, it's a big ole unfair world, and my conservative libertarian views are going to get short shift from the 'mainstream media'. Ohhhh.
Next article; Bush signs bill authorizing border fence at 'odds with his stated purpose of reformed immigration policy." Paraphrased, quotes mine. I don't think he was hot for the fence, but no where in the article is it mentioned that the majority of Americans want the fence. That's an uncomfortable fact, and better left out.
Next article- how historically, fences fail. The way fences fail in the 'history' viewed by the author is interesting. Everything fails. Why build an M1 Tank knowing it will just become obsolete? So with fences. The German's reinforced coast is one of examples of proof about failed fences. I guess failed is the real judgement call; we lost an awful lot of lives on D day. The 'fence' worked, because it required a real cost to beat it, one that took the Allies a long time to get around to doing.
When we lock our bikes, we don't do so knowing it will stop every thief; we just want it to deter most.
OK. So what about this Mexican American fence? I dunno. On one hand I just want to laugh. I mean, come on. How about a moat too? And those Florida Alligators that are too big and numerous now? Yep- let them swim there. But one point raised in the article showing how fences fail mentioned when San Diego County build its 60ish mile fence, 'all it did was redirect traffic to the remote and dangerous AZ desert." Paraphrased, quotes mine.
Sounds like a working fence to me.
A fence is not a replacement for an answer to this illegal immigrant limbo we're in. I hope to God it is not our only response.
Naturally, former Mexican President Fox is against the fence, yet Mexico is far far harsher with the illegal Guatemalans on its southern border.
Bush wants the illegals here grandfathered in; just like last time this hit public awareness. Is that the answer?
I do think there needs to be an aparatus whereby Mexican nationals can work here and leave.
And I know, this sounds really wierd, but it would please my anarchist butt if we hired illegals to build the fence....
I'd be willing to grandfather some of those illegals in...
Life is very strange. Does anyone doubt for a moment there would not be illegals in the workforce building our fence? Now, about those alligators....
munk
Hardly a conservative paper, but interesting at times, and every so often, even with enough guts to go against the NY Times.
So there's a list of recent articles. In one, I learn this is the dirtiest political year yet, and the Republicans are the most at fault, because they are desperate. I'm not happy with elected officials who predate on young teens, but note there have been Democrats who had sex with pages and there were no consequences. And I'm not even thinking of Clinton. So, it's a big ole unfair world, and my conservative libertarian views are going to get short shift from the 'mainstream media'. Ohhhh.
Next article; Bush signs bill authorizing border fence at 'odds with his stated purpose of reformed immigration policy." Paraphrased, quotes mine. I don't think he was hot for the fence, but no where in the article is it mentioned that the majority of Americans want the fence. That's an uncomfortable fact, and better left out.
Next article- how historically, fences fail. The way fences fail in the 'history' viewed by the author is interesting. Everything fails. Why build an M1 Tank knowing it will just become obsolete? So with fences. The German's reinforced coast is one of examples of proof about failed fences. I guess failed is the real judgement call; we lost an awful lot of lives on D day. The 'fence' worked, because it required a real cost to beat it, one that took the Allies a long time to get around to doing.
When we lock our bikes, we don't do so knowing it will stop every thief; we just want it to deter most.
OK. So what about this Mexican American fence? I dunno. On one hand I just want to laugh. I mean, come on. How about a moat too? And those Florida Alligators that are too big and numerous now? Yep- let them swim there. But one point raised in the article showing how fences fail mentioned when San Diego County build its 60ish mile fence, 'all it did was redirect traffic to the remote and dangerous AZ desert." Paraphrased, quotes mine.
Sounds like a working fence to me.
A fence is not a replacement for an answer to this illegal immigrant limbo we're in. I hope to God it is not our only response.
Naturally, former Mexican President Fox is against the fence, yet Mexico is far far harsher with the illegal Guatemalans on its southern border.
Bush wants the illegals here grandfathered in; just like last time this hit public awareness. Is that the answer?
I do think there needs to be an aparatus whereby Mexican nationals can work here and leave.
And I know, this sounds really wierd, but it would please my anarchist butt if we hired illegals to build the fence....
I'd be willing to grandfather some of those illegals in...
Life is very strange. Does anyone doubt for a moment there would not be illegals in the workforce building our fence? Now, about those alligators....
munk