- Joined
- Dec 30, 2009
- Messages
- 353
Since you already have that in mind I suggest you just go ahead and get it. If you don't you might keep wondering about it later. Sure it's a bit more expensive, but it's cheaper than getting something else and eventually getting the Hurttila anyways.
I'd choose one of Pasi's knives over any of the three in your OP.
Which model are you looking at? I suggest going to the source and buying from Pasi directly. It'll be a longer wait as he'll have to make your knife, but it'll be cheaper. Depending on the handle material you want it might even fall within your budget. Buying from Finland is hassle free these days with PayPal and email communication.
I second every word. Pasi is himself a hunter and backpacker and has been a wilderness guide for 10 years, so you may enjoy a nice talk before purchasing.
I'll make you an easy prediction: if you'll end up taking either a tuohipää or a tuohisarvi, be prepared to put any other knife to rest.
The combination of rhombic section and birch bark has simply no match and the only knife that can properly sobstitute a bark handled puukko is just another birch bark puukko. Just to give you an idea, since 2011 I bought three tuohipää from Pasi and they are the only puukkos I take outdoor.
As for the Kullervo I can tell you it has a lower C content steel and is tempered bit lower than Pasi's puukkos. The sheaths is also quite loosy compared to knife quality.
Speaking of Marttiini, they are in 1075 tempered to 56 HRC, so don't expect that great edge holding.