I typically don't post on this sort of topic, but its been awhile since I made a post, and figure, why not.
I would just like to point out a few observations:
Firstly, this thread is in the Knifemaker's
Shop Talk - BladeSmith Questions and Answers forum, which is supposed to be about "The art of knife making- advice on methods, supplies, and materials." Basically a place for knifemakers to come and discuss knifemaking methodology with each other, or for others to ask makers questions regarding methodology. I fail to see how this thread fits into this topic at all. The majority of participants offering "expertise" in this thread are not knifemakers and are not offering any sort of advice, or inquiring about knifemaking, whatsoever. If folks want to continue this debate, I don't think this is the appropriate forum and it should be moved elsewhere.
Secondly,this thread and the debates and discussions here are futile. What has been debated and compared are opinions and preceptions. No true conclusion can be made regarding this, since there are no hard facts, and the original question was so vague that opens the door for all sorts of other side discussions that may or may not relate to the original "topic". When opinions and preceptions come into play there will always be disagreement, and no way of proving who's right or who's wrong (that takes quantifiable facts).
Thirdly, this thread was originally posted almost a year ago, the debate was hashed out, back and forth, until folks got bored and it was allowed to die. There is no point in resurrecting a dead and futile thread and continue the exact type of discussions that were already done in the past.
Additionally, in this debate, there seems to be two separate sides, those who are big Busse fans/customers, who love his product and think its the best, and those who don't. Very few who are "contributing" to this discussion that actually have experience with enough knives (we are talking LOTS of knives here, from as many sources as possible) to really have a true, strong foundation for their opinions. Most folks are just working with a limited amount of experience with a few different knives from a couple sources. There are a lot of folks posting here who have stated that Busse INFI is the best, but they don't own any INFI knives, but will, because they are the best. Assuming something is better than something else without actually experiencing/observing/testing it yourself, just because other say it is, proves nothing and is an empty claim. AND one of the biggest issues I see here is the use of vague terms like "Best" and "better" which are meaningless without the proper context in place, as well as trying to compare things against each other when their purposes and intended functions don't match. For example, if I said "INFI is the best steel/HT out there" and then tried to prove that by prying open car doors with a Busse and a high performance chef's knife. Of course the Busse would be "better," but that term only applied to that situation. Put the Busse up against the chef's knife in a fine onion dicing or sushi slicing competition and it would loose horribly, making the chef's knife "better". These two types of knives were designed specifically to do two completely different things and thus excel at one task while failing at others. There is a reason there are so many different types of knives out there. People can't go around debating things if no one is willing to clarify their judging criteria and be willing to accept that you must compare things on an equal level, under the same intended use, with the same criteria.
And finally, I would like to point out that unless you can physically go around and test and quantifiably compare an INFI Busse to every single knife out there from every single custom maker, you can't make the claim that INFI is the "best," only that it is better than what ever it might have been tested against (and deemed better than), in that specific use/purpose. There may be other knives out there that are better, but have just not been tested or observed. This is a claim that would be very hard to verify.
I would like to state that I can not make any comments about Jerry's work, as I have no personal experience with it. I only have experience with my knives. I don't bash any other makers, and I don't think anyone should (going either way). From those who say that they own his knives and think they are great, sounds like he does good work, and I wouldn't doubt it. And at the same time there are MANY MANY other makers out there who also produce very good work and should not be slighted. There is room at the table for everyone, and just because someone likes one makers work more than another's doesnt' make them right and everyone else wrong, or them wrong and everyone else right.
Sorry for the length... guess I must be trying to make up for my recent lack of posting over here
