- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 786
You better hope you stay lucky, -Lucky-. If you won't take the law's advice, why ask for ours?
Have you read anything I've posted? I DON'T carry autos because they are illegal in my area.
Last edited:
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
You better hope you stay lucky, -Lucky-. If you won't take the law's advice, why ask for ours?
I read through a number of these posts and I own some switchblades. In my state, it is legal to own them, but not legal to carry or sell. Guess I'm stuck with them.
If I read it correctly, it is illegal in MN to posess one. That means you can not even "own one".
I got my concealed carry permit primarily so that I could carry a loaded handgun in my vehicle. I do carry it some times legally. I saw the cost of the permit as being essentially nothing in relation to the trouble (cost) of having a LEO discover a loaded handgun in my vehicle or person regardless of the circumstance. I have been told by LEO's that in my case I would not be prosecuted if I carried as a part of my job. But I was not going to take that opinion as a binding legal opinion. Just not worth it.
I would not carry a switch blade knife as the assisted opening knives are really fast anyway. I have no reason other than as a novelty item to even own a switch blade knife and the same would apply to blackjacks and "brass knuckles".
Lucky,
Its funny that you mentioned that for the 3rd time. As I was reading this thread I was thinking the exact same thing. I guess that sort of makes the point that regardless of what the actual law may say some officers will only read what they want, just like some of the people that responded to your thread. That in itself should make anyone who thinks about breaking the law to carry an illegal think twice. Some people only see what they want to and let negativity do their thinking for them.
First off no I didn't get busted, because I don't carry one. But what I'm asking is really what are the chances? (I've owned them before and I'll own them again, and unless I can legally I won't carry one)
But if you aren't waving it around in public or something of that sort nobody is going to know that pocket clip is from an auto...so as long as you are an average law abiding citizen (minus that auto in your jeans of course) I don't see any ways you could get "busted" for having it on you..
Please point out where my logic is flawed.
If the law serves no purpose, it shouldn't be a law. Am I supposed to feel bad about not caring about breaking a knife law? I'm not implying that the laws don't apply to me or that I am above the law, but letting Government think for you is a very bad idea.
Well I live in Ca.
If caught with a auto, I'm sure it will be confiscated, but will there be any other action taken against the person? By the officer?
This isn't an argument about whether the laws should exist or not, they do and that's that. This is a question posed by someone asking if it's a good, logical idea to carry an illegal weapon. It isn't, and no amount of soap-box ranting over personal rights to bear Autos is going to change that, atleast not anytime soon. There's a big difference between mindlessly following the government, and mindlessly doing stupid, illegal and unnecessary things.
I cannot stand that attitude. Instead of condemming him for wanting to carry an auto, shouldn't you be asking the more important question of why is it illegal to carry one?
Is what he is doing a bad thing because it's morally wrong, or because the Government says it's wrong? Since they're so good at making great decisions![]()
Have you read anything I've posted? I DON'T carry autos because they are illegal in my area.
And all it would take would be a traffic stop by an LEO who decides to pat you down. Not a rare occurance.
I would probably not go out of my way to sass your friendly neighborhood moderator.![]()
There's no doubt that the laws against autos were the product of shameless political window dressing in the 1950s. Stupid would be an understatement. But stupidity of the law would not be a defense if you're caught violating it.
So you have to consider the risk v. benefit analysis. The benefit of carrying an auto is arguably not that great considering the availability of many folding knives that deploy as easily and as fast or faster.
The risk is great. Totally aside from incarceration, which would be bad enough, if you're convicted of a felony you can no longer lawfully own a firearm or even ammunition. And all it would take would be a traffic stop by an LEO who decides to pat you down. Not a rare occurance.
Out of all the times I've ever been pulled over, I've never had a cop even ask me to step out of the vehicle.
To the best of my knowledge they can't pat you down or search you or the vehicle without probable cause or a warrant.
I have been pulled over once before with my Paramilitary in my pocket and I just unclipped it and put it in the center console before the officer left his vehicle just for the sake of the officer not feeling in danger at all on a night stop in the city...so I could have had a lightsaber in my pocket earlier and he wouldn't have known...ha
To the best of my knowledge they can't pat you down or search you or the vehicle without probable cause or a warrant.
I have been pulled over once before with my Paramilitary in my pocket and I just unclipped it and put it in the center console before the officer left his vehicle just for the sake of the officer not feeling in danger at all on a night stop in the city...so I could have had a lightsaber in my pocket earlier and he wouldn't have known...ha
Probable cause can be "I didn't like the way he responded to questions" or "He appeared nervous".
The fact of the matter is "I've been pulled over plenty of times, and have never been searched" is null and void. Thats like saying "I've smoked cigarettes for years, and never had lung problems". Just because it hasnt happened yet, doesnt mean it wont happen.
Lucky, the reason people are responding the way they are is because you are asking a question about the consequences and probability of being caught with an illegal weapon. It insinuates that you're thinking about carrying one in public, even though you say that you wouldnt. It's a heated debate, and it obviously is a controversial subject (as is any weapon or concealed carry law). Don't be surprised when people see the post and respond with a strong view on the subject.