- Joined
- Apr 1, 2001
- Messages
- 738
I will begin my comments by stating my opinion: what happened is really rather silly and unfair.
On the other hand, you, or your parents, made a contractual agreement with the authority (public or private) to utilize their property. I am quite sure that somewhere in the process it was stated that weapons (which I hope were defined) were not allowed on the property contracted for.
The system that we live under states that when you have title to property you have the right to utilize the property in the mannor that you choose, within the bounds of the law.
This is a free enterprise system. If you don't like the rules, don't enter into the contract.
Is one person's "right" to possess a weapon, of any type, more of a right than another person's right to determine the use of their property?
I own my business, and I allow possession of guns or knives. That is my choice. But if I chose not to allow those objects, that is also my right.
If you don't like my rules, patronize some other establishment. That holds for pro or anti gun or knife.
I believe that your rights do not lessen my rights. If the rules are stupid (which as we all know, they tend to be) - change them.
Don't come onto my property, ignore our "contact," and expect me to allow it - I won't.
I support the right to utilization of one's property with the same vigor that I support the 2nd amendment, my right to own knives, and my right to sit in my back yard in peace.
Ed
On the other hand, you, or your parents, made a contractual agreement with the authority (public or private) to utilize their property. I am quite sure that somewhere in the process it was stated that weapons (which I hope were defined) were not allowed on the property contracted for.
The system that we live under states that when you have title to property you have the right to utilize the property in the mannor that you choose, within the bounds of the law.
This is a free enterprise system. If you don't like the rules, don't enter into the contract.
Is one person's "right" to possess a weapon, of any type, more of a right than another person's right to determine the use of their property?
I own my business, and I allow possession of guns or knives. That is my choice. But if I chose not to allow those objects, that is also my right.
If you don't like my rules, patronize some other establishment. That holds for pro or anti gun or knife.
I believe that your rights do not lessen my rights. If the rules are stupid (which as we all know, they tend to be) - change them.
Don't come onto my property, ignore our "contact," and expect me to allow it - I won't.
I support the right to utilization of one's property with the same vigor that I support the 2nd amendment, my right to own knives, and my right to sit in my back yard in peace.
Ed