- Joined
- Feb 28, 2006
- Messages
- 4,012
Commitment and abortion:
Right, here's a babble about what I'm not really grasping -
.
Those three shots depict nothing other than a glorified map case to me. It seems like an amazing amount of luggage both in terms of weight and intrusion for such a small amount of contents. My rather ancient map case is fairly capacious. In additions to maps I have acetate overlays in it, compass, pens, paper, and I can easily fit a knife, torch a couple of glow sticks a some magic markers [just for object simulation] in it. Yet it seems tiny by comparison. I can hook it on a shoulder strap when I need it handy or stick it in my map pocket when the rain really kicks in. I appears to do everything that does except for the usherette tray thing. On that, the single feature, usherette, is what causes the gargantuan weight difference between that and mine.
As I see it the only way of ameliorating the weight once you've made that commitment to it is to hang other stuff off it.
.
Whilst the above picture does show some other stuff bolted on it is a fairly trivial return. Those extra couple of little pouches and whatnot could not possible compensate me for the difference in weight between the basic map luggage and my map case. I'd need to be bolting on a lot more than that once I'd made the commitment to the extra weight.
That's what leads me to wonder. As I see it to get any kind of real returns that offset the weight and so on of the base platform I'd have load it up even more. And that load would be distributed in exactly the kinda position that gives pregnant women back ache. Failure to commit to a hefty pregnant load carry bunch of bolt on bits would be a relief to my spine, but then leaves me back where I started; an amazing amount of luggage for a map case. And obviously I'd want to abort that idea because of the weight and so on...the loop. I don't see a good way of recovering the difference.
Right, here's a babble about what I'm not really grasping -
.



Those three shots depict nothing other than a glorified map case to me. It seems like an amazing amount of luggage both in terms of weight and intrusion for such a small amount of contents. My rather ancient map case is fairly capacious. In additions to maps I have acetate overlays in it, compass, pens, paper, and I can easily fit a knife, torch a couple of glow sticks a some magic markers [just for object simulation] in it. Yet it seems tiny by comparison. I can hook it on a shoulder strap when I need it handy or stick it in my map pocket when the rain really kicks in. I appears to do everything that does except for the usherette tray thing. On that, the single feature, usherette, is what causes the gargantuan weight difference between that and mine.
As I see it the only way of ameliorating the weight once you've made that commitment to it is to hang other stuff off it.

.
Whilst the above picture does show some other stuff bolted on it is a fairly trivial return. Those extra couple of little pouches and whatnot could not possible compensate me for the difference in weight between the basic map luggage and my map case. I'd need to be bolting on a lot more than that once I'd made the commitment to the extra weight.
That's what leads me to wonder. As I see it to get any kind of real returns that offset the weight and so on of the base platform I'd have load it up even more. And that load would be distributed in exactly the kinda position that gives pregnant women back ache. Failure to commit to a hefty pregnant load carry bunch of bolt on bits would be a relief to my spine, but then leaves me back where I started; an amazing amount of luggage for a map case. And obviously I'd want to abort that idea because of the weight and so on...the loop. I don't see a good way of recovering the difference.