If ( Value = Quality / Price ) then Case is greater than GEC.
Well no, because the cost of quality does not go on a linear scale.
As there are fewer flaws, it takes increasing amounts of time, effort, precision, inspection, and rejection rates - all of which equal money - to create smaller increases in quality. One major reason is that the easily seen and achievable fixes have been done.
It's a lot easier to improve from Hen & Rooster quality to Case, than from Case to GEC.
For a lot of patterns, there is simply no choice for me. Case makes a wide array of patterns. They also make far more small patterns, which is what ends up in my pocket. Yes, GEC has made small Northfields but these are the exception. There seem to be a lot of really tall GEC blades, fatter than "normal" handles, and other bulkiness that I really don't favor.
OTOH for many covers, the cost of Case goes up sharply, well into GEC territory. Sorry, but the quality isn't there for the price - their MOP's are closer to $200. I'm not talking about Tony Bose collabs either. The overly polished, overly rounded feel isn't for me either.
Ideally, for me GEC would make some stuff in the peanut to half-whittler size. If they made more patterns that I use, I'd pick them up right away and put off the other knives on my list.
So in reality I like the Queen/S&M F&W's I have. The pattern selection and size fit my tastes. All but one have equaled my Cases in quality, better steel, better price for cover materials.