Chris Reeve Green Beret Video Desrtuction Test Completed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Messages
1,009
Blade length 7"
Thickness: .220"
Steel : S30v stainless
Overall length: 12.375



Summary of test: Chris Reeve Green Beret combat knife.

Cutting: I peeled an apple using the plain edge portion of the blade. This was easy to do. I cut some 10,000 pound webbing making controlled cuts.
The Green Beret came very sharp and cuts well.
Chris%20Reeve%20GB%20D%20Test%20Part%201_0002.jpg


Chopping: I chopped through a 2x4. It took some effort but did the job well for it's size and weight. It didn't do as well as the A1.
Chris%20Reeve%20GB%20D%20Test%20Part%201_0004.jpg


Cutting: I cut some more webbing. I lost some of the initial edge after the chopping but not very much.

Batoning: I batoned 2 2x4's this was very easy for the Green Beret.
Chris%20Reeve%20GB%20D%20Test%20Part%202_0001.jpg


Tip Work: I was able to did a hole through a 2x6 very quick and easy. No tip breakage occurred.
Chris%20Reeve%20GB%20D%20Test%20Part%202_0003.jpg


Sheet Metal Penetration: I stabbed the tip into some heavy gauge sheet metal many times and moved the knife side to side. I finally broke the tip. The tip is thin on the Green Beret . The knife didn't penetrate very deep.

Hammer impacts: I placed the edge onto a 2x6 and hammered on the spine using a 3lb steel mallet. The knife took some blows and seemed very solid up to a point. I continued this task and the blade broke about 2 inches from the handle.
Chris%20Reeve%20GB%20D%20Test%20Part%203_0001.jpg


At this point I had catastrophic failure.

Side Tang Impacts: I only had about 2 inches of the blade left. I placed it in the vice and using the 3 lb steel mallet I hit the handle in two hits it broke. These were not even very hard hits. I start low and work my way up during this test.

Flex Test: Using the broken portion of the blade I wanted to see how it would flex. I used a pipe wrench on it since the knife was in two parts. I was able to get the blade to about 30 degrees several times before it broke. The remaining portion of the blade had some flexibility and strength.
Chris%20Reeve%20GB%20D%20Test%20Part%203_0003.jpg


Overall: The Green Beret is a nice cutter and has nice functional serrations. The exposed metal around the handles looks nice but did a number on my hands and fingers during some of the impact work.

The Green Beret is not tough at all. I was never able to do many of the very hard tasks/tests that many very inexpensive knives laughed at, like the Cold Steel GI Tanto and the Buck Nighthawk.

The Green Beret is made out of s30v Like the Strider BT. The Strider BT was very tough compared to the Green Beret and gave me a run for my money. The Green Beret is one of the most fragile knives I have destruction tested to date.

I would expect much more out of a blade that cost 300 bucks. Cost itself does not determine knife performance but I would expect more then what the Green Beret showed me.


The videos are in 4 parts posted at www.knifetests.com

Enjoy the videos. They were made for you. :thumbup:
 
I got a Green Beret a few years ago. I have never used it. I guess it will remain in my drawer. My Scrapper 6 cost 1/3 as much and is a lot tougher. Thanks for doing the test, noss. I'd hate to destroy a $300 knife!
 
Just finished watching it, that was dissapointing!Especially because it' s a 300$ knife, you could just buy a 20$ knife, and that would do better than that one.
 
i guess you dont always get what you pay for,im dissapointed i was considering buying one.
 
Interesting destruction test once again. :thumbup: Pretty abysmal results for the Green Beret, though. There's really no excuse for that kind of failure...

I mean, yes, knives are cutting instruments, not hammer or crowbar substitutes. But with a blade profile and size like on this Green Beret, and with the steel left to low RCs as it is, what kind of performance is it going to give in cutting work? At its very best, only average. I think I could mention a 3$ knife that would do pretty much all cutting tasks better than this knife, and at 1/100th of the price. :( If it's not an exceptional cutter, then it had better be an exceptional beater at that price - but looks like it isn't. Looks much like a waste of perfectly good money to me, but perhaps this was a faulty specimen or something like that.

One has to wonder though, whether the choice of steel (S30V at low hardness) and the partial serrations had something to do with the blade failure. Serrations weaken a knife, and S30V isn't exactly the toughest steel on the planet.
 
Nice work, Noss, as always. Hey, at least you saved some strength for future tests :).
 
I wonder what the results would have been with A-2? Has Noss ever tested custom knives? Remember, this is insane abuse of a knife.
 
Horn Dog: Your welcome. The Scrapyard Scraper 6:thumbup: is in a league of it's own compared to the Green Beret.

Elen: A S30V knife can be a good beater. I saw this with the Strider BT. The serrations may have been a factor but they come on this knife. A bad choice maybe ? Compared to many it was a very easy break.

I did loose the initial edge after chopping and batoning. I usually never experience this with the majority of the blades I test. Inexpensive or expensive. Edge retention is more then likely very poor here as well.

From my perspective a modern combat knife better be tough and strong first. I can buy a Mora for 10 bucks if all I want to do is cut.

I'm really interested now in testing a Crusader Forge. I want to see how their
S30V stacks up. CF says they are the toughest knives you can own. I wounder if it's true ?

HoB: Thanks. Thats one way to look at it. Next up will be the Ranger RD7 I hear they are tough. I will soon see just how tough they are. :D
 
Lycosa: No I have not tested a custom yet. I didn't get to the insane parts of the tests with the Green Beret. I was just getting started.
 
I wonder if it follows that the other CRK fixed blades would fail in the same way??

Was there a fundamental problem with the design of this particular knife to make it fail??
 
I wonder if it follows that the other CRK fixed blades would fail in the same way??

Was there a fundamental problem with the design of this particular knife to make it fail??

S30V stainless almost always will not last when hammered and battered. Noss dishes out a great amount of abuse that only some knives can handle! :D
 
I wonder if it follows that the other CRK fixed blades would fail in the same way??

Was there a fundamental problem with the design of this particular knife to make it fail??

I wonder also if this is any reflection on other CRK knives, fixed blade or otherwise.
 
Man I though these were supposed to tough combat knives. I rather have a K-Bar in 1095. At least I know it can take more abuse and still ask for more.

Great test as always Noss:thumbup: I'm sure you just saved someone more than 300 dollars because of this test. Then again, maybe this was a bad knife?
 
A2 is soft and wouldn't have "snapped" like that I think. A folder should NEVER see that kind of abuse anyway, so the point there is moot.

Any notions of testing a one piece from CRK? That would be interesting.
 
Next up will be the Ranger RD7 I hear they are tough. I will soon see just how tough they are. :D


I'm looking forward to this one, but dude, remember that Justin doesn't exactly sharpen the RD series before he sends them out, on purpose. This will substantially affect some of your tests, methinks. I just got one a week or two ago, and it's taking a fair bit of work to get it usably sharp. That said, my RD7 is definitely, um, robust, you might say. Keep a tube of icy-hot, handy. :)
 
Well, I guess Bill Harsey, Chris Reeve and the guys from Crucible are retards and anyone with an apple, a 3lb hammer and a hockey mask is the real authority. Of course there were so many test controls the info is infallible.
 
I posted a link to this thread in Chris's sub-forum. I'd like to hear him chime in on this. It does seem like this knife should have taken more punishment before breaking. Aside from the actual breakage, it was apparent that the handle was doing a number on your hand. This alone would keep me from buying it.

It's entirely possible that you just happened to get one with a bad HT. I don't know. That S&W you reviewed impressed the crap out of me though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top