Whoa! I just got called a Cold Steel hater because of a few of my reviews. I figured I'd justify my words, and maybe see if I'm being fair to Lynn Thompson's company, or am I really against Cold Steel?
A few weeks back, I compared the Cold Steel Kudu to the South African Okapi, which the Kudu was based on. http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=518111
Cold Steel calls the Okapi horribly over-priced, poorly made, and of sub-standard materials. Their website says so, right here... http://www.coldsteel.com/20k.html
So, we have the $5.50 Kudu, and the $6 Okapi. I found both to be pretty equal in terms of workmanship, although the debate of wood versus plastic handles will go on forever. The blade on the Kudu was harder to keep an edge on. The Okapi held a good edge for a long time. The blade on the Kudu is 4116 Krupp, which is comparable to cheap 420 steel (in my testing). The blade on the Okapi is nice-quality carbon steel. So, that leaves the "over-priced" claim. Let's just say that I'd rather buy $60 worth of Okapis than $50 worth of Kudus.
Then, a few days ago, I compared the Cold Steel Ultimate Hunter to the Kabar Large Folding Hunter. http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=520157
Again, I found the less expensive knife (the Kabar) to be better. I just don't see the point in selling a knife for over twice the amount of a competitor, when there's no real difference in performane.
What if I made my own brand of knives, came up with an obviously ripped-off version of a Spyderco Endura, and then claimed that the knife I based it on (Endura) was poorly made, overpriced, and of sub-standard materials? By the way, my knife wouldn't be Spyderco's VG-10, because I think it's a sub-standard material. Instead, I'll use AUS-6 or 440A. Because I think it's better. And instead of paying $51 for an Endura, because you know, that's horribly over-priced, my knife will only cost you $45. And forget about the poor quality of the FRN Endura... I'll make mine out of glass-filled nylon or plastic. I'll just think of another name for it. Zytel... no, taken. Kraton... nope. Thermorun... yes, that'll work.
So, I guess after that last paragraph, I really do hate Cold Steel. Well, how about that? I know that I don't like Cold Steel at all because of their blatant rip-offs, then claim that theirs is superior. But I feel that my reviews were very fair. I gave both knives a chance, and through no fault of mine (because the knives I compared them to had the same stuff done to them), both Cold Steel knives were the poorer choice. Don't even get me started on the $15 Cold Steel Bird & Trout knife that my buddy got and snapped in half during normal use, when my $7 Mossberg Bird & Trout set (2 knives) is still holding up very well after a year of use.
Merry Christmas Lynn Thompson; your knives are not worth the money I spent on them. I'll keep my Okapis and $20 Doziers.
A few weeks back, I compared the Cold Steel Kudu to the South African Okapi, which the Kudu was based on. http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=518111
Cold Steel calls the Okapi horribly over-priced, poorly made, and of sub-standard materials. Their website says so, right here... http://www.coldsteel.com/20k.html
So, we have the $5.50 Kudu, and the $6 Okapi. I found both to be pretty equal in terms of workmanship, although the debate of wood versus plastic handles will go on forever. The blade on the Kudu was harder to keep an edge on. The Okapi held a good edge for a long time. The blade on the Kudu is 4116 Krupp, which is comparable to cheap 420 steel (in my testing). The blade on the Okapi is nice-quality carbon steel. So, that leaves the "over-priced" claim. Let's just say that I'd rather buy $60 worth of Okapis than $50 worth of Kudus.
Then, a few days ago, I compared the Cold Steel Ultimate Hunter to the Kabar Large Folding Hunter. http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=520157
Again, I found the less expensive knife (the Kabar) to be better. I just don't see the point in selling a knife for over twice the amount of a competitor, when there's no real difference in performane.
What if I made my own brand of knives, came up with an obviously ripped-off version of a Spyderco Endura, and then claimed that the knife I based it on (Endura) was poorly made, overpriced, and of sub-standard materials? By the way, my knife wouldn't be Spyderco's VG-10, because I think it's a sub-standard material. Instead, I'll use AUS-6 or 440A. Because I think it's better. And instead of paying $51 for an Endura, because you know, that's horribly over-priced, my knife will only cost you $45. And forget about the poor quality of the FRN Endura... I'll make mine out of glass-filled nylon or plastic. I'll just think of another name for it. Zytel... no, taken. Kraton... nope. Thermorun... yes, that'll work.
So, I guess after that last paragraph, I really do hate Cold Steel. Well, how about that? I know that I don't like Cold Steel at all because of their blatant rip-offs, then claim that theirs is superior. But I feel that my reviews were very fair. I gave both knives a chance, and through no fault of mine (because the knives I compared them to had the same stuff done to them), both Cold Steel knives were the poorer choice. Don't even get me started on the $15 Cold Steel Bird & Trout knife that my buddy got and snapped in half during normal use, when my $7 Mossberg Bird & Trout set (2 knives) is still holding up very well after a year of use.
Merry Christmas Lynn Thompson; your knives are not worth the money I spent on them. I'll keep my Okapis and $20 Doziers.