- Joined
- Dec 26, 2010
- Messages
- 1,091
I read about that. But there's no such thing as a free lunch. And I believe that applies to steel too.
I mean you're not opening it or closing it to "wear it in," right? So what is happening? I think you're somehow weakening the steel by stressing it.
I didn't want a weakened or stressed lock. I wanted one with a good, correct fit. And I didn't get one.
Leaving it open doesn't do anything to the strength of the lock, what it does do is slightly (very slightly) weaken the spring that keeps the lockbar engaged.
I don't see how the Scorpion is really different from a traditional back lock, except being harder to unlock. The advantage of the Triad is that the stop pin also prevents the lock bar from being pulled off its pivot or being pushed into it. The Scorpion is just a huge back lock with no reinforcement near the blade pivot.
That's pretty much how I see it also. Also, the pin on the Scorpion lock is both the lock (via tension on the bar) and the stop pin (via compression). It does seem like it has the self-adjusting feature of the Triad lock, because the Scorpion lock has a round pin slotted into a very slightly tapered cutout in the blade tang. The only other thing that really differentiates it from a super overbuilt back lock is the ability to lock/wedge the lockbar open with the secondary lock. Overall, as far as a mechanical design, I think it is not as innovative or elegant as the Triad lock. It will be interesting to see if CS adopts it and if they do, how they do it.