- Joined
- Aug 27, 2004
- Messages
- 12,955
That example is a true story Cougar but perhaps not the best analogy to use. I just threw that out there instead of rehashing the Black Sable drama. My example is exactly right on with your comments though.
A law suit is like preparing for war. You look at the theft, you see several things that are different or changed, you weigh the possibility of loss of both time and money and as I said the guy guilty of the theft gets off because the risk is too great to take the chance. Which is just what the thief was gambling on in the first place when he makes minimal changes so it can look like it isn't really stealing or so it can come off as unique in its own right.
I'm not meaning to suggest that it is. I'm simply talking about the theft of an idea or design where the idea is modified just enough to make it look original and unique even though it isn't, not the patent laws per say.
A law suit is like preparing for war. You look at the theft, you see several things that are different or changed, you weigh the possibility of loss of both time and money and as I said the guy guilty of the theft gets off because the risk is too great to take the chance. Which is just what the thief was gambling on in the first place when he makes minimal changes so it can look like it isn't really stealing or so it can come off as unique in its own right.
The problem of patent enforcement is not that people can evade a patent violation by changing the dimensions a little;
I'm not meaning to suggest that it is. I'm simply talking about the theft of an idea or design where the idea is modified just enough to make it look original and unique even though it isn't, not the patent laws per say.