I've shopped WM most of my long life .
Strange... I never noticed this vast conspiracy .
That is because as noted above, people like us are not "in the know". We don't know all the current conspiracies that rule and dictate our very being now; only those that speak in hushed tones to one another, someone else "in the know" have the real truth. In fact (I won't speak for you
DocJD
!) I might be so unconscious I might not recognize the truth uncovered by those with their "own sources".
Two things are amusing about this thread. First, why is it that
ANY manufacturer, supplier, vendor or maker is
REQUIRED to do business with Walmart? Can those in the know cite a law, a city code, or legal ruling? Is there any proof anywhere that says everyone has to do business with Walmart or they will suffer consequences? Another aspect might be to consider business with Walmart is a dance with the devil. It is their stores, their distribution system, their employees, etc. If you want to do business with Walmart (waiting for some good GoogleFu here to show me a document of some sort saying it is mandatory) you play by their rules. But in fact, Walmart, the world's largest retailer has vendors knocking down its doors to get shelf space. And if it can be mutually beneficial, Walmart will help the entity that wants to be a "partner" iron out its business and be more successful, at their cost. Sure, it is a form of non-altruistic generosity, but still it is there. It isn't like they wait for someone to go broke, the pick up the vendor name for a song and start making the product themselves. Note the story of Levi's Jeans. Their association put millions back onto the black side of the ledger from a failing company, and made them more efficient. From on time deliveries, market flexibility, quantifiable data such as delivery times and amounts, it was a win/win.
It’s noon on a Tuesday in late April, and the Levi Strauss in downtown San Francisco is nearly empty. There’d ...
www.cio.com
There are plenty of other stories like that. And of course, there are plenty of other stories about folks that didn't/couldn't/wouldn't keep up their end of the bargain with Walmart. Then the edible carrot becomes the stick. With something like 40,000 vendors, they don't have time to nursemaid everyone, and from what I have read in Forbes, Business Week, WSJ op-ed pieces, etc.they make it abundantly clear that working with them requires discipline and determination.
No one makes a vendor make a thinner T shirt. They want the money, they sell out and make a cheaper T shirt for the market exposure. No one makes Hellman's Mayonnaise take a price cut to be on the shelves, but if you make the cut and get shelf space you could be seen in over 11,000 stores daily, or (as of 2020) 37 million potential clients
a day. A single day. What is it worth to get just a piece of that kind of exposure? How much greed is in the company soul to lower the quality of your product to make a quick buck? (Speaking of Buck, I was glad to see the comments quoted from Mr. Buck saying all 110s are the same, and HE didn't sell his soul, or the company's reputation).
A dance with the devil to be sure, but if it works, untold riches are available to those that can make the leap. And of course, those that can't are in tears.
The second thing is that it is a bit odd to criticize pricing and companies that keep prices low on vendors so they can be kept low in the stores The same people that complain about vendors not getting a fair shake are shameless in their delight at finding a knife deal, in some cases a knife that was selling for many times the actual purchase price claimed by the poster. So if it is another seller besides Walmart, is that OK?