One of the things I have a problem with in this thread is we're not armed with a lot of first hand information from one side.
Here are the facts as I see them:<ol>[*] Greg ordered a PH. The one he got didn't open easy enough for him.
[*]He sent it back to PVKT, who replaced it with a newer version of the knife. This new knife apparently wasn't good enough either.
[*]He then sent this knife to REKAT, who worked on the knife even more. Greg admitted there was "about a 25% improvement" in the knife, still not good enough by his standards.
[*]Instead of contacting REKAT back to express his displeasure, he posts his message to a public forum.</LI>[/list=a]
Now, from REKAT's POV, here is what we know:<OL>[*]Bob took this knife back and worked on it
[*]Bob found that this knife was free of mechanical defects, and adjusted the knife so that it was looser.
[*]Both Bob and Chris could open the knife easily.
[*]Bob and Chris talked at length with Greg about opening the knife. Bob mentions that this person was interested in snapping the knife open or some other technique.</LI>[/list=a]
To me, it appears that there is a whole bunch of panty twisting over what is between Bob and his customer.
Both Bob and Greg confirm that the knife was worked on. Greg still wasn't happy after 1. a new knife, and 2. the knife after it had been worked on, and instead of trying to resolve it, he complained.
Bob says that he treated Greg with respect. Greg says he was mistreated. Bob feels that Greg is a liar. After reading all this, I'm inclined to agree with Bob, especially since more than once I've been talking with him and he's interrupted me to talk customer service with someone who had a problem. I've listened to him admit when he's wrong, and offer to do what he can to fix the problem. I feel that is what he did here, and Greg still wasn't happy.
My personal take on this is that Coop and Cliff are reading more into this thread than there needs to be.
Greg got good customer service first from PVK, and then from REKAT. I find it hard to believe that he cannot open the knife using the thumbstud when Bob says that he can open it in a forward or reverse grip, right or left handed. I furthermore find it hard to believe the Chris can do the same thing, and yet Greg cannot. If he can't open it using the thumbstud, especially after the knife has been worked on, I feel there is something else wrong other than the knife itself.
If Greg is trying to open the knife through flicking, then all bets are off. He's trying to get the knife to do something that it wasn't designed for, and isn't happy when it doesn't do it.
Here's what I want to know: How exactly is he trying open the knife? Thumbstud or flicking? Why didn't he contact REKAT again after he was shown that they not only were willing to work on the knife, but discussed with him at length different techniques?
Who has the most credible story? Right now, I see it as Bob, clear and simple. Having worked in customer service, and seeing what Bob's done to try to make this guy happy, and watching Greg turn around and post this smacks of "Sour Grapes" to me.
If there is other information that I do not know, please feel free to fill me in, but this is what I've seen and feel.
Spark
------------------
Kevin Jon Schlossberg
SysOp and Administrator for BladeForums.com
Insert witty quip here
[This message has been edited by Spark (edited 04 May 1999).]