not2sharp
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 1999
- Messages
- 20,411
Warning - This post is intended to kindle further debate
(all in good fun)
Regardless of the original motive I am glad we are rasing the question. If most of us use our knives almost exclusively for utility purposes, and we agree that virtually any knife can be used for defensive purposes (common kitchen knives have probably been used more often than anything else), then why are we and the industry so concerned about using knives for self-defense.
Could it be that knives positioned for "self-defense" are subjected to lower practical conditions and hence easier to design/manufacture/sell, than knives that need to meet, and deliver performance for basic utility?
A knife sold for self defense (i.e purchase exclusively for said purpose) tends not to be used - many of you carry a knife for utility and a separate knife for self defense; nor does a knife developed for self defense need not have a practical blade shape (e.g. Americanized tantos, chisel grinds). Is this just a gimmick to sell anything with a point while capturing the interest of former and current gun entusiast(like myself). Is it an excuse for defending impractical stuff that would otherwise be in-defensable.
I usually assume that any of my knives may and could be used for self defense. My decisioned to purchase a knife is based on whether the knife provides adequate utility for the specific purpose I intend to use it for. I wish we would focus more on utility and lesss on defense - only because the criteria for utility provides a higher test standard.

Regardless of the original motive I am glad we are rasing the question. If most of us use our knives almost exclusively for utility purposes, and we agree that virtually any knife can be used for defensive purposes (common kitchen knives have probably been used more often than anything else), then why are we and the industry so concerned about using knives for self-defense.
Could it be that knives positioned for "self-defense" are subjected to lower practical conditions and hence easier to design/manufacture/sell, than knives that need to meet, and deliver performance for basic utility?
A knife sold for self defense (i.e purchase exclusively for said purpose) tends not to be used - many of you carry a knife for utility and a separate knife for self defense; nor does a knife developed for self defense need not have a practical blade shape (e.g. Americanized tantos, chisel grinds). Is this just a gimmick to sell anything with a point while capturing the interest of former and current gun entusiast(like myself). Is it an excuse for defending impractical stuff that would otherwise be in-defensable.
I usually assume that any of my knives may and could be used for self defense. My decisioned to purchase a knife is based on whether the knife provides adequate utility for the specific purpose I intend to use it for. I wish we would focus more on utility and lesss on defense - only because the criteria for utility provides a higher test standard.