In the past, while perusing the local flea market, I've looked at some really low end quality $10 to $15 knives.
They probably were made from very low end stainless steel, they probably had zero quality put in on their heat treating, many handle parts were very mickey mousey made zinc castings and low end plastics.
With that said, I noticed that most times these knives had very consistent blade grinds to them.
How? I mean, how could it be that such low end products could actually score fairly well in their consistency to have one blade match almost exactly to a duplicate being sold right beside it? Well, the likely answer is that they are made using not only cheap quality materials to keep cost as absolutely low as possible during manufacturing, but the hand labor is likely just as important to keep to a minimal. So, these low end knives are obviously being done on CNC machinery that removes a lot of need for more employees, and is obviously faster and less costly in the time they take to make them.
Now, a company like Bark River does a lot of the final work on their knives by using an actual hands on crafted method.
This not only adds extra costs in the form of it being more labor intensive, but also adds cost because it takes longer to do.
But, since they are a knife production company, rather than a true custom knife maker, the hands on will also mean some deviations from one specimen to another.
The one area that obviously takes a little extra labor, time, and skill, is their convexed blades.
I personally do think that they should really try honing in on correcting the issues that are most often brought up when it pertains to quality control.
That said, with they being semi hand crafted production knives, I think they may likely not make everyone happy, since full modern technology is not one of their goals to achieve. Their hands on methods of manufacturing is considered as one of their positive traits by many of their customers.
As for Mike Stewart, I don't know the man. With that said, I think he will go down as being as controversial as Jim Parker was.
Kind'a sad, but does seem to be what has happened with his reputation.
Jim Parker had people that thought very highly of him, and others felt he was bottom of the barrel material. I believe Mike Stewart has the same reputation now, and will likely never be able to turn that around.