- Joined
- May 12, 2012
- Messages
- 846
Hello ShopTalk, how's it going?
This is my design for a small modified sheepsfoot blade.
Planned specs are:
7" OAL, 1" height
.113 CPM 3V tempered to 60HRC
Full Flat Right Hand Chisel Grind with back microbevel
One note, I usually design my knives facing to the left. Even though I drew the bevel on the left side, it will be a right handed grind.
I'm planning to use an epoxy-soaked paracord handle.
My goal when I started designing this knife was to come up with something that I could use and abuse in my knifemaking shop. Almost more of a tool then a knife. The main idea was to have a blade that could make accurate scoring cuts, could be used to cut leather cleanly and for opening boxes while being light weight and tough. Cutting performance became a driving factor, hence the FFG and thinness.
The problem when you start making blades that thin is chipping and edge damage. CPM 3V is commonly touted for its toughness. When used on a chopper it can be tempered down to a low HRC for incredible toughness and on a small knife it can be tempered to a high HRC using its toughness to prevent the chipping that commonly occurs at high HRC. I'm taking a middle ground at 60 though that is one thing I would like you guy's opinions on. Remember that this blade is meant to be used and abused.
I like the design but I'm not set on blade steel yet though 3V seems like it would work well. I'd really appreciate everyones advice here. Eventually I'd like to make a carbidized Ti version as well.
So, what do you guys think? Is it good, is it awful, is it so mind numbingly stupid/brilliant that I should be instituted/applauded? Or is it just meh?
Thanks for looking
This is my design for a small modified sheepsfoot blade.
Planned specs are:
7" OAL, 1" height
.113 CPM 3V tempered to 60HRC
Full Flat Right Hand Chisel Grind with back microbevel
One note, I usually design my knives facing to the left. Even though I drew the bevel on the left side, it will be a right handed grind.
I'm planning to use an epoxy-soaked paracord handle.
My goal when I started designing this knife was to come up with something that I could use and abuse in my knifemaking shop. Almost more of a tool then a knife. The main idea was to have a blade that could make accurate scoring cuts, could be used to cut leather cleanly and for opening boxes while being light weight and tough. Cutting performance became a driving factor, hence the FFG and thinness.
The problem when you start making blades that thin is chipping and edge damage. CPM 3V is commonly touted for its toughness. When used on a chopper it can be tempered down to a low HRC for incredible toughness and on a small knife it can be tempered to a high HRC using its toughness to prevent the chipping that commonly occurs at high HRC. I'm taking a middle ground at 60 though that is one thing I would like you guy's opinions on. Remember that this blade is meant to be used and abused.
I like the design but I'm not set on blade steel yet though 3V seems like it would work well. I'd really appreciate everyones advice here. Eventually I'd like to make a carbidized Ti version as well.
So, what do you guys think? Is it good, is it awful, is it so mind numbingly stupid/brilliant that I should be instituted/applauded? Or is it just meh?
Thanks for looking
Last edited: