Rather than encouraging collectors to support new/young makers, is it not best to let the market decide how many it can support?
I don't think so, because the custom market is probably skewed in favor of the more highly popular and more prestigious makers in the industry.....toward the "stars" of our industry, if you will. I sure know it is on this custom knife forum.
This may mean that only the most popular, and most expensive makers will be considered by the new collector, or even seasoned collector, out of ignorance.
We need to let them know that they don't have to go to the "best", most expensive makers to get a good quality custom knife that they'll be proud of. The first, second or third hand made knife for their collection doesn't necessarily have to come from Dean.
A young or new, first time custom collector may not know where to really turn to for his/her first or second order of their desired custom knife. And, because their knowledge of custom knives may be limited due to only hearing about the most well known knife makers, a newly interested collector may believe that his only avenue for purchasing a custom knife is by ordering it from one of the better knowns, which isn't a bad thing, but it could turn a new custom buyer off if his first or second custom knife order is going to cost him too much to get it.
New, or less popular, makers enable custom ownership at a perceived affordable price. Even for long-time collectors, like me. The key word here is "perceived".
We need to educate the first time buyer and let him know what all his options are for buying that custom knife they want that they don't think they can afford.
IMO, now is the time to promote and market custom knives targeting first time buyers along with promoting the younger custom or not so "famous", more affordable makers. It's a good match for both parties, IMO.