afishhunter
Basic Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2014
- Messages
- 14,438
Growing up ... well ... aging from childhood to adulthood, at any rate ... in Iowa, I started with slipjoints (a "DEMO" knife my Uncle gave me at age 4 or or 5 while he was home on leave) was my first knife. It was joined by a Barlow (Imperial or Colonial, I forget which. It was cheap shell construction, anyway, with good carbon steel blades) and a little later, a stockman.I grew up thinking that locking was better than non-locking - now, I'm not so sure.
A lockback (Buck 110) was among my birthday or Christmas presents in 1968. It was on my belt everyday until I lost it in 1975 while working in So. Cal.
I replaced it with a Old Timer 7OT, with a 1095 blade. No idea what happened to it ... I didn't get another 110 until 2014.
A blade lock isn't really necessary ... unless you do something stupid, like attempt to cut something with the spine, or don't pay attenton to what your doing. To be honest, the back spring isn't really necessary, either. Folk been totin friction folders for several thusands of years. (I believe the oldest known folding knife dates to 500~600 BCE. Most folks ain't lost fingers or other of their parts to their friction folders or spring knives AKA: "Slpjoints".
My normal carry is still a couple slipjoints. I pretty much retired the lockbacks a couple years ago. Single blades is one of the reasons. That is one of the reasons I don't tote my friction folders very often. I like multi blade knives.
Last edited: