- Joined
- Nov 1, 2012
- Messages
- 130
If a lock can be made to fail by simple hand pressure on the spine without any prior abuse
Then it isn't a lock.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
If a lock can be made to fail by simple hand pressure on the spine without any prior abuse
Because seatbelts are designed as a dedicated safety device against the inevitable mistakes of the humans driving vehicles.
The lock on a knife was designed to hold the blade open for usage and was never meant as a safety device. The safety device on a folding knife is the user, his knowledge and proper judgement. Not all users come equipped with these things. The lock on a folding knife was never intended to "Idiot Proof" a knife against a users lack of knowledge or practice of poor judgement.
And Hinderer and CRKI don't think anyone said anything about applying "light force to the cutting edge." Just because it is marketed as hard use, that doesn't give you the checkered flag to abuse the knife then cry when the lock fails due to the abuse. As I stated, I have dozens of high end to midrange folders. The only knives I own that I can't force some lock flex on are my Striders and my two Militaries. My PM2, Griptilian, and 0560 all have irreconcilable vertical play. My Emersons have minor lock flex if I muscle down on them.
Because seatbelts are designed as a dedicated safety device against the inevitable mistakes of the humans driving vehicles.
The lock on a knife was designed to hold the blade open for usage and was never meant as a safety device. The safety device on a folding knife is the user, his knowledge and proper judgement. Not all users come equipped with these things. The lock on a folding knife was never intended to "Idiot Proof" a knife against a users lack of knowledge or practice of poor judgement.
Awhile back we had notable user complaining of lock failure on a relatively high end knife he was using to dispatch a feral hog.
He claimed poor design and poor manufacture. As it turns out, he had stabbed the beast and was using a twisting motion when the lock failed.
By his own admission it was deduced that he most likely tripped the lock during usage, causing the blade to close on his fingers and should have used better judgement than to use a folding knife in that manner and would have been better served by a fixed blade.
Emerson knives are marketed as tactical, defensive and hard use knives.
If I buy one and have to slash and stab my way out of something the lock should not fail..
or at least not fail by just pushing down on the top of the spine with ones palm..that will obviously not work well in any situation and I would encourage anyone with a Emerson (or any other tactical use knife ) to push down on the blade with the palm (wearing gloves for protection) to test their knife before depending on it with your life.. that is just common sense and much like running several rounds through an automatic to insure it does not jam or fail.
Where in that marketing does it say that the mechanism is a failsafe?
No matter how many rounds a person puts thru any automatic, there can still be failures. The user is still responsible for choosing good ammo and for using the rifle in a safe manner. No marketing ploy or statement absolves the end user of his own responsibilities for safety and good judgement concerning usage and/or maintenance.
Where in that marketing does it say that the mechanism is a failsafe?
No matter how many rounds a person puts thru any automatic, there can still be failures. The user is still responsible for choosing good ammo and for using the rifle in a safe manner. No marketing ploy or statement absolves the end user of his own responsibilities for safety and good judgement concerning usage and/or maintenance.
I was not referring to safety.. just to lock failure. I never mentioned the word "failsafe"
Now you're reaching. He used the word failsafe; you just simply described it.