I have the F1 ceracoated with leather, S1, A1, H1 and U2
They are very good knives, but i am not sure about using VG-10 for a large knife, even after using my A1 as a throwing knife and seeing that knife test guy beat one with a sledgehammer, it is a steel more suited for thin kitchen knifes i say
I talked with the boss man from Fällkniven for a while about that and he did not see my point about modern high-tech carbon steels being more suitable for a bowie
Fällknivens factory seems to only produce laminated blades, which is especially weird on their tiny thin folders, like the U2, not sure why it would need to be laminated
I agree with Peter!
Laminated VG-10 works very well in the NL1 and NL2 knives and they have a thinner edgegeometry than the A1.
The point Peter is talking about, is that most of his customers wants a stainless steel, when they buy a new knife.
There are a lot of more advanced steels out there than VG-10, like CPM 3V as an example.
I have talked to Peter about them and he has said that he will stay with the stainless options.
There are more important factors than the choice of steeltype.
Geometry is by far, more important than the steel.
So is the heat-treatment.
The steel is only in third place after those two.
A very important factor are the endusers sharpening skills and how the users can put on a proper edgegeometry, for the materials they cut.
Without insights in good cutting geometry's and ability to put them on the knife, the knife will not perform as good as it could.
This goes for just about any knife in any steel and even a "simple" steel can be improved a lot, with the right edgegeometry.
Throwing knives are made very soft, not to brake on impact.
A knife made for use on wood, is harder and will suffer from being throwed.
Regrds
Mikael