I'm with Pinnah too. It's not just the size, but thickness and profile. The 110 especially is thick, heavy, long, and broad in the beam (is that a Buck 110 in your pocket or . . . . ?). I will keep pumping the Copperlock though, which has a very pocket friendly profile for a knife 4.25" long. The only unfriendly feature is the "hump" or peak on the clip blade. One member upthread ground his down and there is a wharncliffe version. The Mini Copperlock fits firmly into what I called the gent knife(which I am expanding for this purpose to encompass anything under 3.875" long give or take).
Pinnah, if you wear carpenter pants, do you ever put your knife in the "rule" pocket? That long narrow deep one? That could be a great place to carry beasts if it isnt too deep.
Anyway, there are more things to a traditional knife than just appearance and materials. The folding hunter types certainly qualify, but are closer in some respects to the Military and its ilk than to slipjoint traditionals. If you are interested in a different knife experience with lockback security, consider the size of the beastie and its blade profile.
Anyway, YMMV.
Pinnah, if you wear carpenter pants, do you ever put your knife in the "rule" pocket? That long narrow deep one? That could be a great place to carry beasts if it isnt too deep.
Anyway, there are more things to a traditional knife than just appearance and materials. The folding hunter types certainly qualify, but are closer in some respects to the Military and its ilk than to slipjoint traditionals. If you are interested in a different knife experience with lockback security, consider the size of the beastie and its blade profile.
Anyway, YMMV.
