Fehrman and Busse

what sort of work did you do with the four knives to compare handle comfort?

What sort of work have I done with the knives?
1. Cut up old 2X4's
2. Split dried alder branches by using a "no bounce" hammer to baton with.
3. Cut down a bunch of bamboo.
4. chopped loose a bunch of ivy growing on the backside of my fence.
5. cut up bunches of cardboard.

The Fehrman First Strike dose not fatique my hand at all nor does the Trident Oberland 03. The Busse exposed tang tends to work away at my fleshy area between my thumb and first finger. The Extrem Ratio Harpoon has a velcro like hook material running through the center part of the handles and without gloves this becomes very abrasive after a very short time of use.

FWIW
Ciao
Ron :eek:
 
The only thing that I didn't like about the Fehrman handle (on the larger First Strike, not the Peacemaker), is the single finger groove between the first finger and rest of the fingers. I thought I would like it, but after using it for a while, find that I don't. I have been contemplating having them grind it off for me, which I've heard they will do.

If you view the knives "butt on" as opposed to "head on", the Fehrman handles are a little more "ovalish" to me, the Busse's a little more rectangular. I'm talking E-series here. Depending on the size of your hand, you might prefer one over the other. I find them both pretty comfortable, although I just got my first HH Busse handle, and haven't yet tried it out.

I didn't notice if the rubber made a difference, but I wasn't using them side by side, which I'll try to do later. Yet another knife test...
 
Mr. Stamp,

I beg to differ with you on almost everything you have said in your responses to me. I'm going to take this one subject at a time. Sorry I don't know how to make the quote function work so I will quote you with your name first and in italics:

Cliff Stamp: "Don't ask the people selling you a product to evalute it. That statement isn't even close to true, S7 is in fact brittle compared to some steels."

How did you come up with that? Seriously? Cite someone, please. I am not trying to be an ass here, I really do want to learn. I ask you again, with all due respect, what steels make S7 seem brittle by comparison? I really want to know.

You did mention someone named Carpenter. So I spent an hour today on the internet trying to find a reference work on tool steels by anyone named Carpenter. I was unsuccessful. Does he have a first name? Would you mind telling me the name of the work? That would make it a little easier for me. I promise you I will buy the book tomorrow regardless what it costs. We have here a fair amount of reference materials, but nothing by a Carpenter.

Regards,
Allan
 
Cliff Stamp: There are other steels. Wear resistance also not strongly correlated to edge holding for a lot of knife uses. In some knives it in fact makes the edge retenion worse. In larger knives specifically this is the case. S7 would have far better edge retention in a bolo than 10V for example.

Correct me if I am wrong here (I have no doubt that you will :) ); we have no specifications on “edge retention” from ASME, AISI, or anyone else I can find. So we extrapolate edge retention from wear resistance and hardness. Two metals having the same hardness should have edge retention approximately equivalent to its wear resistance. Would you agree?

So how in the world can you say high wear resistance makes edge retention worse in some knives?! No matter how I try, I cannot reconcile that statement, except maybe in some Bizarro parallel universe. Excuse the sarcasm, but that statement just cannot stand without justification. Please educate me.

If you want to say S7 is a better choice due to toughness, OK, I’ll buy that. But to say it would have “far better edge retention” is just completely irreconcilable to me.
 
Cliff Stamp: In regards to crucibles reports, they are mostly meaningless because they don't tell you how the steels were heat treated, they are only points and not temper responces and they only give one test.

Your comment about Crucible’s report is wrong. They do give the exact heat treat condition of all the metals in the report. Please give me the courtesy of at least clicking on the link I provide before saying something like that. I give the link again:

http://www.crucibleservice.com/datash/ds3Vv5b.pdf?CFID=1095883&CFTOKEN=54242094

By the way, Crucible is a respected supplier of knife steel. I believe if you check Jerry Hossom's and the Chris Reeve websites you will find they specifically point that out. Crucible makes all kinds of steels. They don't care which one we choose. They have no reason to hype any one over others. They try to give us the information we need to make the best choice.

Again, I am not trying to be a jerk here. I do respect your opinions. I just need further information from you to reconcile your statements.

Best regards,
Allan
 
Cliff Stamp: Some of the hot work steels are significantly tougher than S7.

You alluded to hot work steels, but were not specific. So I checked the “H” tool steels (hot working tool steels). They are very tough indeed. Much tougher than A2, D2, or M2, for example. But the toughest H-steel, H12, is not nearly as tough as the least tough S-steel, S5 (S-steels are also known as shock steels). And it’s barely in the same ballpark as S7. So I assume you were not referring to those.

My source here is “Heat Treatment, Selection and Application of TOOL STEELS” (his caps, not mine) by Bill Bryson; Hanser Gardner Publications, copyright 1997.

Best regards,
Allan
 
I replied to this in detail but it didn't show so I'll use point form this time :

1) Wear resistance is only a critical factor in edge retention if deformation resistance, impact toughness and corrosion resistance are not. Consider for example that 10V would have horrible edge retention in a salt water fillet knife as it would rust too quickly, 420HC would be much better even though the wear resistance is very low. 15V would have horrible edge retention in a parang as it would chip too easily, S7 would have much better edge retention even though the wear resistance is much lower.

2) Carpenter is a steel company (cartech.com).

3) Bryson's statistics are horribly mixed up, most (all) of them are not actually v-notch, some of them are torsional impact. They also ignore the fact that some of the steels (W series) are only case hardened in the large impact samples and thus the pearlite cores make them very tough. This is true for S2 as well for example. This however would not hold if they were used in knives as the cross section is much higher.

4) Look at steels with a much lower carbon content to get higher toughness. Steels like AerMet (Carpenter) has a very high charpy-v notch for example. Just browse through their site and see how they qualitatively describe S7 and then how they describe the really tough steels.

5) Crucible is of course pushed very hard by the people who sell their products. This is of course an indirect way to promote yourself. See how great my products are, I use this great company. Obviously if I am selling someones product I am going to tell you they are great. Who says "Buy my products, I use this crappy material supplier." Ask around and talk to the people who do not think high carbide steels are the holy grail for knives and see what they think of S30V vs 13C26 for example.

I am offering you the red pill, they are giving you the blue one. All I am offering you is the truth, nothing more.

-Cliff
 
Cutler686, hello. I just wanted to thank you for starting this thread. I was not aware of Fehrman. Nor was I aware that anyone was making production knives out of CPM 3V. I would imagine that is some difficult stuff to machine.

Also I wanted to apologize for practically taking over this thread thru my debate with Cliff Stamp. I look for ways to gracefully exit, but he keeps saying stuff that I just have to respond to. So please bear with me for one more round.

Best regards,
Allan
 
If you don't want to sidetrack the thread you can just start off a new one, link to the old and fire off an email to attract the attention to the poster. However most UBB have a threaded mode or similar where you can see discussions which diverge from the main path and ignore them at will.

-Cliff
 
Hello again Mr. Stamp. I hope I am not being a thorn in your side, but I am compelled to respond.

Cliff Stamp: 1) Wear resistance is only a critical factor in edge retention if deformation resistance, impact toughness and corrosion resistance are not. Consider for example that 10V would have horrible edge retention in a salt water fillet knife as it would rust too quickly, 420HC would be much better even though the wear resistance is very low. 15V would have horrible edge retention in a parang as it would chip too easily, S7 would have much better edge retention even though the wear resistance is much lower.

Sorry to disagree again. Wear resistance and hardness are the criteria for edge retention period. Perhaps we will never agree on that. It’s not fair to compare a non-stainless like 10V with a stainless like 420HC in a medium that only affects the non-stainless such as salt water. What you have described is corrosion resistance that is a different property. Edge retention must be considered in its virgin state or you cannot have consistent or accurate data. I do not know what a parang is or I would probably also respond to your last sentence :) also.

Cliff Stamp: 2) Carpenter is a steel company (cartech.com).

Thank you for that!

Cliff Stamp: 3) Bryson's statistics are horribly mixed up, most (all) of them are not actually v-notch, some of them are torsional impact.

How can you possibly know that? That is a pretty strong indictment unless you are certain of your facts. I quote from page 128, 3rd paragraph: “Shock or impact resistance is based on actual testing that has been performed on hardened metal samples. There are various types of tests, but we are only going to discuss factors that are derived from the “V” notch Charpy test.” None of his data came from any other tests, unless he is lying.

Cliff Stamp: They also ignore the fact that some of the steels (W series) are only case hardened in the large impact samples and thus the pearlite cores make them very tough.

Again, I don’t see how you can know this. Please describe the basis for this claim. Bill Bryson is a respected authority on tool steels. I cannot believe he is lying or misleading us in his book.

Cliff Stamp: 4) Look at steels with a much lower carbon content to get higher toughness. Steels like AerMet (Carpenter) has a very high charpy-v notch for example. Just browse through their site and see how they qualitatively describe S7 and then how they describe the really tough steels.

I did look at their site in several sections including the AerMet section. Perhaps I overlooked it. Can you please give me a more specific link? Their website is very large. I still would like to know what is tougher than S7.

By the way, I am not being argumentative for the sake of it. I have a pet project that I have been working on for several years (not knife related). A major component will have to absorb some horrific shock impact strikes from tool steels. As you know, not much can stand up to that for long. S7 is by far the toughest material we have seen. I am truly interested if there is anything on this Earth that is tougher. And I will personally thank you for pointing me in the right direction.

Cliff Stamp: 5) Crucible is of course pushed very hard by the people who sell their products. This is of course an indirect way to promote yourself. See how great my products are, I use this great company. Obviously if I am selling someones product I am going to tell you they are great. Who says "Buy my products, I use this crappy material supplier." Ask around and talk to the people who do not think high carbide steels are the holy grail for knives and see what they think of S30V vs 13C26 for example.

I don’t think either Jerry Hossom or CRK has to promote anyone’s steel to sell their knives. From what I understand they sell them as fast as they can make them. I really shouldn’t have brought them into this debate. I only wanted to point out that top flight knife makers use Crucible steel. I honestly believe they chose those steels because they believe it is the best possible material for their product. I respect their decisions.

Cliff Stamp: I am offering you the red pill, they are giving you the blue one. All I am offering you is the truth, nothing more.

I am not too sure what you meant by this, but thank you, I think :)

Best regards,
Allan
 
Edge retention must be considered in its virgin state or you cannot have consistent or accurate data.

This is a useless defination. Here is the only one that makes sense :

Edge retention : a measure of how long a knife retains a productive sharpness during working conditions.

Thus for a salt water fillet knife, the edge retention is highly critical on corrosion resistance.

A parang is a large chopping knife, one of many, bolos, goloks, khukuris. The edge retention of them would all be poor in high carbide steels with exceptional wear resistance because the steels would all micro-chip.

Note even if you want to ignore these complications, guys like Johnston have shown for years that wear resistance is not the only factor, and not even the critical one even if you ignore corrosion resistance and toughness.

Johnson showed this on rec.knives by taking steels like ATS-34 and noting that it had a poor ability to hold a very high sharpness at a low angle. The problem was that all these large carbides which give it good wear resistance actually tear out of the edge and it goes blunt faster.

Landes showed this recently including micro-graphs on steels and detailed measurement showing how steels like S90 had poor ability in this regard than steels like 13C26 even though S90V had way more wear resistance. I wrote up some notes on this awhile ago that you can read over in the article I wrote on edge stability.


How can you possibly know that?

Checked against ASM texts. I referenced a bunch of them on the website. His values are also WAY too high to be v-notch. Larrin corrected me on this months ago, which lead me to investigate it further and determine he was right, the data is mangled.

[core]

Please describe the basis for this claim.

I am pretty sure from memory, Bryson even notes this earlier in his book in the section on W1 that it won't fully harden. It is well known that steels like W1 are case hardened and are very tough because of the pearlite core, you will find that in any ASM text.

Their website is very large.

You have to sign up to look at the more detailed information. There is a section where you can ask them for their handbook. It is a very detailed guide. Get it and read through it, it only took them about a week to send it to me. Look at how Carpenter describes S2 vs S7, but again there is a core issue here, they even state it specifically. S7 though has a nice combination of hardness/toughness, the really tough steels are much softer, usually 45/55 HRC.

I only wanted to point out that top flight knife makers use Crucible steel. I honestly believe they chose those steels because they believe it is the best possible material for their product. I respect their decisions.

That is the ideal customer responce. I was just pointing out that a lot of people feel they are not only ideal, they are actually POOR steels for knives. Again, you can't ask the people selling a material for an unbiased opinion on it, of course they are going to tell you it is great. Ask someone who sells the opposite and the reality is likely inbetween.

-Cliff
 
Back
Top