I've seen both sides of that. They're very hit or miss. When you get a good one they are great knives....... On the flip side.... -_-
I love my 2 Emerson's.. I am sorry I offended anyone.. All I am saying is the QC should be much better.
I just look at things from a business perspective. The knives when they are right, are outstanding. For the small sample size (5) I owned, 2 had issues. Too me, that is an awful percentage. I don't think any US manufacturer of anything should have 40% QC issues on anything! Soo let's say I was unlucky..
What is acceptable for QC issues ?
My answer is less than 1%. No one is going to argue that EKI is close to that.
My guess is they probably ship 20% of their knives with issues.
Super Early lockup, dirty, poor centering, etc.
I think your best bet with an Emerson is to buy one second hand, from someone that can work the kinks out.
Again, great knives.. Lousy QC.
Having run my own company for 30 years.. I just have never seen lousy QC be a sustainable model.
BTW-- the guy that was bashing Harley clearly hasn't been on one in 10 years.. Harley makes a damn fine Motorcycle.
Check out the sales and bottom line..and after you do that I have a question.
How big of a building would you need to be able to print the kind of cash they make every quarter? The only person that prints more money than Harley is the US government.