My view then, for what its worth...
Fixed, thick blade
I dont like thick blades. You dont get the same feel, or feedback from them.
3.5-4.5 inches (give or take a few cm's)
Longer is better for cooking/food preparation but I'm in and out of a 4x4 and long knives are a pain on your belt. 4" (100cm) max. I find 90cm ideal.
Good in the kitchen, good in the woods
I dont like using a blade to cut turf, open bags of cement etc and then use it to make my sandwiches. That just doesnt work for me. I'd suggest a longer, finer blade for kitchen work, stainless (say 12C27) and a slightly shorter polished high carbon, maybe thicker blade, for the woods.
A great compromise, and the nearest I have to an all rounder (given I have one for work and one to prepare food) is an Iisakki 5226 puukko in polished high carbon.
I would like it to be pleasing to the eye.
I wouldnt mind a wife like that.
Fixed, thick blade
I dont like thick blades. You dont get the same feel, or feedback from them.
3.5-4.5 inches (give or take a few cm's)
Longer is better for cooking/food preparation but I'm in and out of a 4x4 and long knives are a pain on your belt. 4" (100cm) max. I find 90cm ideal.
Good in the kitchen, good in the woods
I dont like using a blade to cut turf, open bags of cement etc and then use it to make my sandwiches. That just doesnt work for me. I'd suggest a longer, finer blade for kitchen work, stainless (say 12C27) and a slightly shorter polished high carbon, maybe thicker blade, for the woods.
A great compromise, and the nearest I have to an all rounder (given I have one for work and one to prepare food) is an Iisakki 5226 puukko in polished high carbon.
I would like it to be pleasing to the eye.
I wouldnt mind a wife like that.