Sadly, I probably have "city slicker" hands nowadays (desk job for me

). But about an hour and a half or so is the longest I've ever used my BK9 in one sitting, and never had any problems with it. And I was aware that the schrade was also designed for the "rearward handle grip" or whatever we want to call it (hence the weird jimping on the underside of the rear of the handle on the tang).
I haven't handled the SCHF37, but like I said, it "looks" uncomfortable to me. I haven't handled one yet, so that's just me going off of the looks

.
I'm not surprised the Schrade out chops the BK7. IIRC, the BK2 out chops the BK7, which is 1.75in less blade length. The BK7 was never really designed for chopping, so it makes sense why the Schrade would be better at is (under the assumption that the Schrade was designed primarily as a woods/chopping knife). And the BK9 being thinner/higher grind is why it can bind more in some wood (it penetrates farther, and on some wood types it can get stuck, similar to how a machete will).
I was looking around for a HRC rating for these, but didn't see one. Do you happen to know what the HRC rating is supposed to be? And while maybe I don't use my Beckers every day, I can assure you that in the 4 years that I've owned my BK2 and BK9, they've done fine by me. I didn't make any youtube videos about it though

.
Good input there. I feel the same way about small fixed blades vs folders, and my favorite fixed blade size.
The small knife + big knife + saw combo works great. If I was only going out with a single blade, I'd likely be getting the BK12/16/10. But with the multiple knife system, the BK10 starts to feel pretty redundant with the BK9 around, hence the smaller other knife.
But yeah, its always a work in progress, trying to find what works best for how we each use our knives and what works best for where we use them.
Cheers

.