The image that was posted above which had the FK and the GSO 4.7 gave me the opportunity to stage a rough comparison that I've been wanting to do for a while to look at the layout of those two knives from the perspective of handling similarities and/or differences.
At a glance both knives look like they bring a substantially different functional layout to bear, given the rather straight-looking GSO and the curved spine and canted blade of the field knife. However, when you overlay their silhouettes, and rotate them to situate likely points of hand/finger contact together, which will determine the blade positioning relative to the user's grip, it looks like they both wind up bringing the knife to the work at
roughly the same position and offset from the hand. What's interesting to me is that when viewed this way (ie. with the handle as the positional reference, rather than the blade), the GSO 4.7 starts looking a bit more like a nessmuk: the rear handle swell starts looking less like a handle swell, while the mid spine through the blade starts looking a bit sway-backed.
My GSO 4.7 is still in the mail, and my Field Knife only showed up last week, and I haven't done any real work with it yet, but I'm pretty curious to see which I prefer where the palm swell is concerned, as that seems to be the central difference in the design of the two knives' grips.
Anyways neat fodder for contemplation, I thought.