For the "NIB=absolutely perfect" crowd. My honest opinion.

Feedback: +28 / =0 / -0
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
4,527
This message is partly for the "NIB=perfect knife only" crowd, and partly for me screaming against what I see dying in the forum I love:


While I understand your frustrations at not receiving exactly your expected perfect knife, honestly and without malice, people like you are why I really don't want to deal with the exchange much. By that I mean that we are on two separate end of the knife spectrum. No insult, but because of people that are worried about every little scratch and ding on their new knife (as is their right), every single knife seems to be turned into a Grail knife that has to be kept pristine and immaculate because it will go up in price. To me, becoming a commodity, and sadly no longer a knife.

To me a knife is made to cut, to be in the hand and to be used. Not every knife has to be used every day, but they all should be able to be pressed into appropriate service if needed. And not every knife deserves to be locked in a safe. I've seen people complaining to sellers about how the knife came from the factory, as if that is fault of the guy who bought it. On a $60, $70, $120 knife there will be small things wrong with it. At all prices there will be something wrong with it. It's a manufactured knife. I don't understand why so much reverence is placed on pristine examples of knives, outside of greed in most cases.

If you ask yourself why you care if the knife has a scratch, and the answer is- it hurts its value.- that is greed. You are allowed to think about profits, demand, retirement. It's your right. But I feel that it's become an epidemic that is destroying my hobby.

I'm just left wondering when knives stopped being knives, and fanaticism made everybody NEED THAT KNIFE BECAUSE ITS THE BEST THING EVER!!!!!!! WITH THE BEST STEELS AND HANDLE MATERIALS!!!! AND ITS NEVER GOING TO CUT ANYTHING BECAUSE SOME DAY IT WILL BE WORTH MORE MONEYYYYYY!!! BECAUSE I HAD TO HAVE IT TO SIT IN MY SAFE FOREVER BECAUSE ITS THE BEST!!!!!!!!! just like every other knife untouched in the safe...... How many Mule Team knives stay in the box never to be used as Mule Team comparisons, because they are worth too much to use- WHEN THAT WAS THE REASON THEY WERE MADE!!!!

I'd rather give away my knives on here than try and attempt a trade these days. The time on here for comaraderie, trading good knives to good people because of what the knives are, not the dollar behind them, seems to be disappearing in the general BF. Replaced by, how much can I get out of you without giving anything up. Or how little can I get this out of you so I can flip yours for more!!! My last five or six attempts at a trade were the same, they wanted a great knife, and offered me common, lower quality knives for it- and little of what I say I want, but all at a premium because they were NIB.

I've said it before on here. I don't care if your Delica is NIB- it doesn't make it worth more to me!!!!! I don't pay for fanaticism, and NIB (to me) has become a monster on its own, elevating prices through imitation. (If this knife is worth "x" more, then that must mean mine is proportionately more valuable too! Plus if everybody is looking at things with an eye loop- I better get myself on their level of criticism because that is how it's done here- look at ignorance toward PayPal gift in every thread "just because when I started I say everybody state gift or +3.5%- to me it's the same phenomenon with NIB and value and criticism).

I long for the days of knives being used for a bit and decided they weren't for me, and passed along on the exchange, offered to a friend because it fills a hole in his collection. Not just driven by profit and the greed for my own collection because the newest is out and it's like sharks to chum. Then we wonder why new members go from no knives to thousands spent in a couple of months just to catch up, and they don't have a clue how to even put an edge back on the knife they bought, not do they have equipment. They catch the fever and must have what everybody else must have.

When was the last time you looked at your latest "must have" and said- I really don't need it. Knowing that it will sell out/that you could profit off of it/sure deal? To let other knife aficionados get it at the real price? If your answer to that is "Well somebody else will just buy it and sell it for profit on the exchange, why shouldn't I?" Then to me you are the problem, maybe without knowing it, maybe fully knowing it. Knives can be a business, absolutely has to be!! But to be a good business you don't squeeze everything out of your customers as you can (that's a scum successful business), you take your fair share and give people value for their money- in my books. Bladeforums, to me, doesn't have to be the scum business, instead I find it needs to be more of a good business, where we are a community out for each other. Which for the most part we do

There are still places where knives are treated as knives, and it seems to me the camaraderie still exists, places like the traditional forum, the wilderness forums, the individual custom makers forums! We use knives, pass them on, and are generally only interested in price if you find a great deal in a flea market or antique store, not how much you fleeced somebody for your newest knife/latest sale. We cut our food, chop our firewood,whittle, and even put... GASP....scratches on a knife!

While I understand that collecting pristine everything will be around- and it should be around: to preserve our history, but as a knife society I think we need to stop and ask ourselves if everybody becoming more like Liu Kang is worth it. I think it's getting worse all of the time, with the microscopes looking for errors getting stronger, and the community feel disappearing due to greed and unneeded pack driven desire to get the perfect knife.

I've probably insulted some fine members here, but I hope not. This is just my observations about what I've seen in my time here, and changes in how people are transacting with each other. In the past a proposal to trade meant excitement to see which interesting knife would be offered, and how the parties could add or delete or change to make it work to add to the others collection. Now I'll offer you a $100 neck knife and $40 for your custom mammoth handled folder, not even similar quality for the knives where the handle scales alone would cost $70.... It's about wondering how you will try to be taken this time...... Not the excitement of dealing with another knife nut. There aren't many of us, we should look out for each other's interests, because they are our own!!


Some of you will understand what I mean, some won't care. But I hope everybody at least looks at their own actions on the exchange and decides if they think they are in line with what is good for the knife community that is Bladeforums and the larger world. And then makes their own choice on how to proceed. And maybe the next time that you are entering a transaction with somebody you will read his/her posts, get a feel for the person behind the screen name, see how they interact with the rest of the forum while/before dealing with them and treat them like a person- not just your next PayPal deposit. If you are a BNIB ONLY collector who only hangs out in the exchange- join the rest of us out here in the rest of the great forum!! See a new person going haywire buying new knives- send an email perhaps suggesting not buying so much and learning how to appreciate what is there. Enter a trade with a new person who might not know that 3°offset to the blade is unacceptable to your perfections, let it slide if truly out of ignorance or QC difference between newb and aficionado. See a newb wanting all of the new knives "we" get with stars in their cyber eyes, offer them a good deal on an older "new" knife you no longer use that is similar, or offer to give one to them.....

Or not. At least I've said my piece and done what I can to try and make change. And hey, if what I said resonates with you at all and you see a knife I have that you love, or you read about a knife I want that you have/have similar to, let's talk and become friends. User knives also carry the character of the previous owners to the new ones!!

Just my side of the "sellers should list the following 85 points that I've determined are important. And if you don't agree that they should all be 100% perfect then you should t collect or sell knives" attitude. Okay, maybe I came across a bit strong in the last example, but my point remains.
 
Excellent post. Passing along a decent price with a knife that cut something should happen more often. I think money problems have turned the exchange hobby into a revenue source for some people. But I also think if some one has a new knife to sell it should be priced accordingly.
 
This topic is in response to my topic so I would like to share my thoughts on this matter.

I have never purchased a knife with the intent of resale at a higher price, and never will. In fact I am not concerned about small cosmetic problems that don't hinder function. When I purchase a knife and I discover small cosmetic problems that were not disclosed, that is completely fine and I believe in those cases the transaction is completed with both parties aware that there are some things that don't need to be said. When I sell a knife that I have personally put to use and put wear on, I always sell it on the Exchange for much less than it is worth because I believe in giving other people an opportunity to try out a less than pristine knife without having to pay the current market price.

For my part I will always disclose any and every cosmetic defect because some buyers are looking for a pristine knife. I think it is unfair to attack or question the reasoning of people who want to purchase an absolutely perfect knife. For many, having an absolutely pristine specimen isn't a concern but for some it is. This becomes especially critical when speaking of limited editions, curios, custom knives, and prototypes. There is no reason to blame them for rejecting a knife based on a scratch. Collectors do not own a knife for its use since the knife will never be used. The own the knife because of many different reasons: the knife represents a unique achievement of mechanical function, is a milestone in a certain knife company's history, has aesthetic qualities unmatched by other knives. So unless the knife is absolutely perfect they are not getting the utility they expected from that knife.
 
This topic is in response to my topic so I would like to share my thoughts on this matter.

I have never purchased a knife with the intent of resale at a higher price, and never will. In fact I am not concerned about small cosmetic problems that don't hinder function. When I purchase a knife and I discover small cosmetic problems that were not disclosed, that is completely fine and I believe in those cases the transaction is completed with both parties aware that there are some things that don't need to be said. When I sell a knife that I have personally put to use and put wear on, I always sell it on the Exchange for much less than it is worth because I believe in giving other people an opportunity to try out a less than pristine knife without having to pay the current market price.

For my part I will always disclose any and every cosmetic defect because some buyers are looking for a pristine knife. I think it is unfair to attack or question the reasoning of people who want to purchase an absolutely perfect knife. For many, having an absolutely pristine specimen isn't a concern but for some it is. This becomes especially critical when speaking of limited editions, curios, custom knives, and prototypes. There is no reason to blame them for rejecting a knife based on a scratch. Collectors do not own a knife for its use since the knife will never be used. The own the knife because of many different reasons: the knife represents a unique achievement of mechanical function, is a milestone in a certain knife company's history, has aesthetic qualities unmatched by other knives. So unless the knife is absolutely perfect they are not getting the utility they expected from that knife.

While your thread is the one that prompted this one, it is much longer standing of an issue here. So please don't think this is me attacking you, it is endemic of a bigger problem here. As I said- everybody has a right to their own place in the knife collecting spectrum.

However I feel many attitudes such as your extensive, and to me ridiculous, list of things a person should list (such as had this knife ever had complaints/issues with the steel) is damaging the fellowship of knives and further turns them into commodities. You say you never buy with plan for resale, then why sell your knives for a loss as soon as you find an issue with them? You are honestly saying that you buy knives to sell them for the exact same price as you bought them, no more no less?? I find that hard to believe honestly. Why did you buy the knives you used as examples in your thread then? I don't get how you aren't in it for profit but are complaining of loss?

I don't buy my knives ever with thought of resale or profit (loss included). I buy them because it's a good deal on a good knife, that compliments holes in my collection. That's it. If I do a trade I look at the knife I get and the knife I'm giving up. I only check out values if I think the other party is trying to take me for a ride. And in the last couple of years it has been the rule, not the exception. Whereby when I first started trading here everybody was more fun and fair to deal with, and it was about working with each other, instead of working against each other.

Don't have to agree with anything I've said, but it's my perception and experience after being here for a couple of months ;)
 
I find it ironic that there are individuals here who have commented, that are the embodiment of the individual scrutinized in the OPs original post...:rolleyes:
 
Whom are you referring to me? I hope not I've never tried to make money off a knife. Hell I have a brand new knife in the exchange right now for less than it can be found anywhere.
I find it ironic that there are individuals here who have commented, that are the embodiment of the individual scrutinized in the OPs original post...:rolleyes:
 
While your thread is the one that prompted this one, it is much longer standing of an issue here. So please don't think this is me attacking you, it is endemic of a bigger problem here. As I said- everybody has a right to their own place in the knife collecting spectrum.

However I feel many attitudes such as your extensive, and to me ridiculous, list of things a person should list (such as had this knife ever had complaints/issues with the steel) is damaging the fellowship of knives and further turns them into commodities. You say you never buy with plan for resale, then why sell your knives for a loss as soon as you find an issue with them? You are honestly saying that you buy knives to sell them for the exact same price as you bought them, no more no less?? I find that hard to believe honestly. Why did you buy the knives you used as examples in your thread then? I don't get how you aren't in it for profit but are complaining of loss?

I don't buy my knives ever with thought of resale or profit (loss included). I buy them because it's a good deal on a good knife, that compliments holes in my collection. That's it. If I do a trade I look at the knife I get and the knife I'm giving up. I only check out values if I think the other party is trying to take me for a ride. And in the last couple of years it has been the rule, not the exception. Whereby when I first started trading here everybody was more fun and fair to deal with, and it was about working with each other, instead of working against each other.

Don't have to agree with anything I've said, but it's my perception and experience after being here for a couple of months ;)

I am not sure how promoting transparency in describing the condition of an item for sale would hurt the community involved with that item.

As for my transactions, I purchase knives with the intent to use them. When I have used a knife and feel that it does not suit my needs, there is little point in me keeping it when another individual might find that the knife would suit them perfectly. Since I've used the knife I list it on the exchange for much less than I paid for it to allow someone else the opportunity to get a good deal on a knife that they may find they like. If this is less than logical please explain to me why.

What I do not appreciate is receiving a knife that has functionality problems that were not disclosed in the sale post. I have no use for a knife with mechanical issues and I cannot in good conscience sell the knife for even close to what I purchased it for. On top of that I haven't gotten any use out of the knife and I haven't gotten an accurate feeling of if the knife suits me or not. I see no reason why I would be obligated not to sell the knife at that point, and no reason why any of my actions cause harm to the community. Again, if my argument is illogical please let me know.
 
I think there's a medium between your posts asdf12345 and cutslikeakris. I think people should accurately describe their knife when selling.. but I also think people should be less picky and use the knives for what there meant. And people trying to get every red cent for a knife that has been used is silly IMO . Idk its tough to explain.

Honesty about the condition of the knife is important to me, I can deal with cosmetic marks I just don't like them not being disclosed. Purposely hiding marks from the buyer is wrong. I also understand sometimes things can be overlooked and I can live with that. But obvious issues not disclosed are wrong.
 
Last edited:
CUTS LIKE A KRIS,

Do your frustrations with what you see happening among the 'enthusiasts' extend to any manufacturers?
I believe, and I think it's obvious, that most of the SFO's, or sprint runs, private label brands, etc.. that we see today could not and would not exist without the market you are opposed to. I think of it as a chicken or the egg kind of thing. Are the manufacturers responding to the market, or the market to the manufacturers? I say both.

I am a little reluctant to list company names to make my point, but I am not disparaging them (or don't mean to) so I will.
Just a few companies that would not exist in any way that you would recognize compared to today's reality without the "NIB=absolutely perfect crowd" that has a safe(s), or drawer(s), or whatever, full of their 'safe queen' knives (top of my head):
GEC
ZT
Spyderco
Busse
Benchmade
Chris Reeve
Emerson
Hinderer
Snody

I'm not saying these companies would not be around, or those makers making knives, but would you ever have the opportunity own a Paramilitary 2 in CF w/S90V steel? or would the Mule series have ever happened? Would the ZT/Hinderer collabs exist? Would the Emerson/Kershaw knives? or Case/Bose?

I like that if I want to coon-finger a popular knife I can do it without much (or any if I buy smart) cost to do so because of the market as it exists.
I don't like most of the knives I see, but I feel like most of the ones I do like would never have been made without the collector/flipper/investor crowd, and for that I thank them.
 
Although I understand there is no such thing as perfect, I do prefer to start off with "NIB".
I, like many (most) knifeaholics collect knives based on personal aesthetic tastes, and positive feedback from other knife owners. I have a handful of less expensive users, but most of my knives are only occasionally carried.
My most expensive knife is an Al Mar Sere. I don't own a safe.
Many knife collectors are not tradesman, or work outdoors. I have worked in public schools and hospitals all of my life. Knives tend to frowned upon in that type of environment.
When I decide that a particular knife is not right for my permanent collection, I will trade sell, barter, or gift. I am very specific in my description so as not to mislead or more importantly disappoint the new owner. I am big on integrity, and do not want a BF member to think I am trying to pull a fast one. Obviously the better condition the knife is, the higher the value, and the more appropriate it is as a gift.
My son is not very interested in my 100 or so knife, machete, hatchet collection. I am not a young man anymore, and will probably end up selling most of them in 20 years or so. When I do they will probably be easier to sell for a fair price, if they are not all beat up.
As far as sharpening a knife goes, I have yet to produce a "scary sharp" :eek: or "hair popping edge" . I am more inclined to spend a shorter amount of time, and I am perfectly happy with a "working edge". I use a sharp maker. There are thousands that never sharpen a knife. When it gets dull they throw it in a drawer, and go to Walyworld and by another cheap knife, lol.
If I was a knife "purist" like you, I would probably limit my collection to about 20 users. To each is own.
 
Last edited:
I don't but NIB, but no one should list a knife as NIB if it's truly not NIB. A knife being NIB is like a woman being pregnant. It either is or it isn't. No middle ground. Just be honest. Some people collect knives without using them, so any blemish means something.
 
I don't but NIB, but no one should list a knife as NIB if it's truly not NIB. A knife being NIB is like a woman being pregnant. It either is or it isn't. No middle ground. Just be honest. Some people collect knives without using them, so any blemish means something.

True, but the obsession with zero blemishes can go to the point where even truly being NIB isn't good enough for folks.
I've seen a few cases where the knife was truly NIB, but the buyer didn't want to accept the level of blemishes present straight from the manufacturer!

When threads come up where complaints about a "bent tip" that is only possible to see under magnification---and even then there was no consensus as to whether a bend truly existed---it gets to the point of being just plain silly.

It seriously has reached the point of obsession I remember from my teenage years of comic books; "This one is only worth 2/3 of list value...see that tiny crease near the staple? No? Look closer with this magnifying glass."
 
I agree with stabman on this, I've had several knives brand new from benchmade with a slightly off centered blade. When I go to sell these knives people want perfection. I sent a benchmade 275 back to benchmade for blade centering and the new one I was given had an off center blade lol it doesn't effect functionality so I just accepted it, but other folks want perfect examples of every knife when in reality they don't come from the factory perfect. Unrealistic expectations I guess, then they wanna tire kick every thing possible to low ball..
True, but the obsession with zero blemishes can go to the point where even truly being NIB isn't good enough for folks.
I've seen a few cases where the knife was truly NIB, but the buyer didn't want to accept the level of blemishes present straight from the manufacturer!

When threads come up where complaints about a "bent tip" that is only possible to see under magnification---and even then there was no consensus as to whether a bend truly existed---it gets to the point of being just plain silly.

It seriously has reached the point of obsession I remember from my teenage years of comic books; "This one is only worth 2/3 of list value...see that tiny crease near the staple? No? Look closer with this magnifying glass."
 
CUTS LIKE A KRIS,

Do your frustrations with what you see happening among the 'enthusiasts' extend to any manufacturers?
I believe, and I think it's obvious, that most of the SFO's, or sprint runs, private label brands, etc.. that we see today could not and would not exist without the market you are opposed to. I think of it as a chicken or the egg kind of thing. Are the manufacturers responding to the market, or the market to the manufacturers? I say both.

or would the Mule series have ever happened?

The Mule Team knives are EXACTLY what I'm talking about with the NIB-only crowd ruining part of this hobby. The Mule team was expressly made so that knife aficionados could try, head to head, exact knives made in different steels. Again, made specifically for USERS! So without the NIB ONLY crowd I do believe that the knives would have been made, because they were made for knife USERS!! And how many are sold NIB for a large increase in price? That wasn't why Spyderco made the series, but I can't afford them because of collectors. Directly showing my point I feel.

And I don't believe that the majority of knives are purchased by collectors who keep them in pristine condition, but there is no way of knowing. But I doubt that the denizens of BF are buying more than 1/2 of Spyderco's, Benchmade's, Emerson's..... And I doubt that NIB knives outnumber user knives in the broad world.

I wasn't delving into SFO's, but again, what is the point of utilizing the newest, greatest steel in a blade if it's never going to be used? Aren't they designed to be used first and foremost? So I can't believe that the companies are only making them for non-use collectors, even if that is where a majority go. Although companies like Spyderco have priced themselves out of my market based on SFO/Sprint run fanaticism and where I feel I'm paying for the name and demand more than the knife any more. My opinion of course, and again everybody is entitled to their knife collecting method, but it still hurts the atmosphere. Plus the traditional SFO's are very used as a rule, which is where I find my attention most days. But your opinion is valid, I just disagree, and without numbers from either opinion it's just speculation- until somebody like Sal Glesser says that the Sprint runs are made for collectors over users, or gives numbers etc......
Thanks for your opinion though.


True, but the obsession with zero blemishes can go to the point where even truly being NIB isn't good enough for folks.
I've seen a few cases where the knife was truly NIB, but the buyer didn't want to accept the level of blemishes present straight from the manufacturer!

When threads come up where complaints about a "bent tip" that is only possible to see under magnification---and even then there was no consensus as to whether a bend truly existed---it gets to the point of being just plain silly.

It seriously has reached the point of obsession I remember from my teenage years of comic books; "This one is only worth 2/3 of list value...see that tiny crease near the staple? No? Look closer with this magnifying glass."

I agree with stabman on this, I've had several knives brand new from benchmade with a slightly off centered blade. When I go to sell these knives people want perfection. I sent a benchmade 275 back to benchmade for blade centering and the new one I was given had an off center blade lol it doesn't effect functionality so I just accepted it, but other folks want perfect examples of every knife when in reality they don't come from the factory perfect. Unrealistic expectations I guess, then they wanna tire kick every thing possible to low ball..

Thanks you too, just how I feel reiterated.
 
Just be candid, up front, and honest in the descriptions of what you want to sell, and there should be no issues. Remember the golden rule from the Bible, "So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets." --- Matthew 7:12 (ESV)
 
This is the best thread I've ever read, in relation to the state of the exchange, and the expectations associated with. I feel like all of my knives are worthless because not a one of them is truly "unused". They're worth a ton to me, but probably 50% of their value to anyone else. I could go in with in depth responses and agreements to each of your points but, rather than rambling for the greater part of this page, I will leave you with a kudos.

Kudos! (to OP and current contributors)
 
Excellent thread.
I agree that not all knives are meant to be kept "NIB"
But this thread made me think about why I haven't really used some knives that I own..some knives that at the time of purchase I told myself I will use and enjoy all its qualities
so how come I didn't end up using them?
I guess in a way, as a "knife enthusiast" there's a whole lot of knives I like to get a chance to hold in my hands..knives I'd like to play around with every once in a while..and you know there's a lot of variations of the same knife...and its a hobby that can get out of hand very quickly..
like do I really need 3 xm-18's? no..but I still like to own them because they are slightly different from eachother ..and I dont end up using all eventho it was designed to be a user..
so why don't I end up using them despite telling myself that I will?
because maybe subconsciously I know I probably can't afford them!! I probably shouldnt be owning this many knives...and if push comes to shelf, its probably easier to sell a "LNIB" knife and get my money back
and until then, maybe I can enjoy "owning" it and playing with it..

It's stupid I know..
 
Wow!
A knife is whatever anyone wants it to be. It can be an item that you buy for profit, it can be something you put in a safe to look at on Sundays, it can be something you use to cut things with everyday.

Point is, nobody has the right to tell anyone what to do with a knife.

It's your property, you use it as you wish. If you want to do nothing with it, or re-sell it at a higher value than that's a choice, but in no way are you taking anything away from this hobby, or other peoples ability to enjoy it (except those that are delusional)

There is room for everyone on this forum, there are all kinds of knives on the exchange, new and used.

Let's not try to project our 'idea of what a knife has to be' onto others. Please.
 
Back
Top