Kohai999
Second Degree Cutter
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2003
- Messages
- 12,554
We are having a good discussion in another thread, so it seems worthy to try for another.
As someone who loves knives, thought to post my thoughts about methods of making knives and the steels used.
I don't have a preference of forged vs stock removal knives per se.
Generally for me, if a knife is carbon steel or damascus, I like it to be forged. I especially like it when the piece is sole authorship and the damascus is made by the knife maker. I have and will continue to find these types of knives, regardless of being folders or fixed blades, to be more desirable and worth a premium for the time and effort that it takes to produce. That is, making the damascus and forging it to shape, then cleaning everything up on a grinder is much more time consuming(and expensive considering equipment required) than BUYING a billet of damascus and simply grinding it down.
At this point in my collecting, almost all of the carbon steel fixed blade knives that I own are damascus blades, and the vast majority are sole authorship
I like stainless for the majority of my folding knives. I'm one of the few it seems that does not care for the patina that carbon steel knives develop. People who say "It's gonna develop patina, just deal with it", I don't get that, nor do I accept it. ALL of my carbon steel Japanese style blades are cutters, and not one has patina. We are talking about blades that are exposed to high levels of salt and alkaline and are still shiny and bright. It has to do with the method of finishing and method of care more than anything else, but we can get into that later. Stainless blades perform quite nicely, hold the edge and don't rust much. I also like stainless damascus and tend towards Devin Thomas damascus because Devin is an originator and a friend. His pattern development is fantastic.
Any part of the handle that is reactive(carbon steel) imo needs to be hidden or treated. Bare carbon tangs will rust/patina. If you like that, fine....but if this is a piece you hope to sell for top dollar at some point in the future.....it better go to the maker for a "spa treatment" before you do so. Almost all buyers do not like rust. By "treated" I mean blued or coated. Take your pick.
It would be an interesting discussion hopefully, but my collection is almost evenly distributed between fixed blades and folding knives, and has been almost from day one. Some makers that I collect don't make fixed blades and vise versa. A mistake that I made early were thinking that a piece from a maker known for a particular genre(a fixed blade from someone who specializes in folders) would automatically be more desirable and sellable was proven to be incorrect time and time again. It's more dependent upon the maker's market position and "hotness" than anything else.
A word about kitchen knives. There is a well known maker who produces fantastic carbon steel kitchen knives that perform wonderfully. I got one, used it and kept it looking awesome. Had a party over Labor Day. Buddy of mine cleaned up the kitchen, and I didn't get a chance to review his work. 1 week goes by and I take a look at the knives. Don't know what he did, but that carbon blade got BURNED(as in chemically burned, not heat wise), and buffing wouldn't take it out. Luckily, Tim Wright made me a S30v utility and delivered it the day that I discovered the issue and he got himself a gently used, wonderfully built utility knife in carbon steel and I got one in stainless to replace it.
I won't buy another carbon steel kitchen knife.....ever....the REQUIRED maintenance to keep them shiny and bright is not worth it to me. There are many chef's and cooks who love carbon steel for their knives and they are welcome to them.
Love to hear all the thoughts out there. Realizing that this is a subject that folks are passionate about, try to keep it friendly!
Best Regards,
STeven Garsson
As someone who loves knives, thought to post my thoughts about methods of making knives and the steels used.
I don't have a preference of forged vs stock removal knives per se.
Generally for me, if a knife is carbon steel or damascus, I like it to be forged. I especially like it when the piece is sole authorship and the damascus is made by the knife maker. I have and will continue to find these types of knives, regardless of being folders or fixed blades, to be more desirable and worth a premium for the time and effort that it takes to produce. That is, making the damascus and forging it to shape, then cleaning everything up on a grinder is much more time consuming(and expensive considering equipment required) than BUYING a billet of damascus and simply grinding it down.
At this point in my collecting, almost all of the carbon steel fixed blade knives that I own are damascus blades, and the vast majority are sole authorship
I like stainless for the majority of my folding knives. I'm one of the few it seems that does not care for the patina that carbon steel knives develop. People who say "It's gonna develop patina, just deal with it", I don't get that, nor do I accept it. ALL of my carbon steel Japanese style blades are cutters, and not one has patina. We are talking about blades that are exposed to high levels of salt and alkaline and are still shiny and bright. It has to do with the method of finishing and method of care more than anything else, but we can get into that later. Stainless blades perform quite nicely, hold the edge and don't rust much. I also like stainless damascus and tend towards Devin Thomas damascus because Devin is an originator and a friend. His pattern development is fantastic.
Any part of the handle that is reactive(carbon steel) imo needs to be hidden or treated. Bare carbon tangs will rust/patina. If you like that, fine....but if this is a piece you hope to sell for top dollar at some point in the future.....it better go to the maker for a "spa treatment" before you do so. Almost all buyers do not like rust. By "treated" I mean blued or coated. Take your pick.
It would be an interesting discussion hopefully, but my collection is almost evenly distributed between fixed blades and folding knives, and has been almost from day one. Some makers that I collect don't make fixed blades and vise versa. A mistake that I made early were thinking that a piece from a maker known for a particular genre(a fixed blade from someone who specializes in folders) would automatically be more desirable and sellable was proven to be incorrect time and time again. It's more dependent upon the maker's market position and "hotness" than anything else.
A word about kitchen knives. There is a well known maker who produces fantastic carbon steel kitchen knives that perform wonderfully. I got one, used it and kept it looking awesome. Had a party over Labor Day. Buddy of mine cleaned up the kitchen, and I didn't get a chance to review his work. 1 week goes by and I take a look at the knives. Don't know what he did, but that carbon blade got BURNED(as in chemically burned, not heat wise), and buffing wouldn't take it out. Luckily, Tim Wright made me a S30v utility and delivered it the day that I discovered the issue and he got himself a gently used, wonderfully built utility knife in carbon steel and I got one in stainless to replace it.
I won't buy another carbon steel kitchen knife.....ever....the REQUIRED maintenance to keep them shiny and bright is not worth it to me. There are many chef's and cooks who love carbon steel for their knives and they are welcome to them.
Love to hear all the thoughts out there. Realizing that this is a subject that folks are passionate about, try to keep it friendly!
Best Regards,
STeven Garsson